NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing all 8 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Salomé Cojean; Manon Grand – British Journal of Educational Psychology, 2024
Background: Taking notes during learning has benefits both during class (through writing things down to encode information) and after class (by using written notes as external storage for revision). Comparisons of note-taking methods (i.e., using paper or a computer) have mainly shown that paper leads to better learning. However, previous studies…
Descriptors: Notetaking, College Students, Preferences, Writing Strategies
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Schrader, Claudia; Kalyuga, Slava – British Journal of Educational Psychology, 2023
The study investigated interactions between learner expertise and task complexity evaluated from both cognitive and affective perspectives. One hundred and seventy-three students, both novices and advanced learners, were asked to learn Japanese writing in a pen-tablet-based digital learning environment with varying task complexity levels.…
Descriptors: Expertise, Novices, Task Analysis, Difficulty Level
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Torrance, Mark; Arrimada, María; Gardner, Sarah – British Journal of Educational Psychology, 2021
Background: Written composition requires handwriting, spelling, and text planning skills, all largely learned through school instruction. Students' rate of learning to compose text in their first months at school will depend, in part, on their literacy-related abilities at school start. These effects have not previously been explored. Aim: We…
Descriptors: Young Children, Grade 1, Writing (Composition), Writing Skills
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Kim, Young-Suk Grace – British Journal of Educational Psychology, 2020
Background: Writing involves multiple processes, drawing on a number of language, cognitive, and print-related skills, and knowledge. According to the Direct and Indirect Effects model of Writing (DIEW; Kim & Park, 2019, "Reading and Writing," 32, 1319), these multiple factors have hierarchical, interactive, and dynamic relations.…
Descriptors: Writing (Composition), Language Skills, Thinking Skills, Knowledge Level
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Greifeneder, Rainer; Zelt, Sarah; Seele, Tim; Bottenberg, Konstantin; Alt, Alexander – British Journal of Educational Psychology, 2012
Background: Handwriting legibility systematically biases evaluations in that highly legible handwriting results in more positive evaluations than less legible handwriting. Because performance assessments in educational contexts are not only based on computerized or multiple choice tests but often include the evaluation of handwritten work samples,…
Descriptors: Handwriting, Multiple Choice Tests, Inferences, Writing Instruction
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Connelly, Vincent; Gee, Deborah; Walsh, Elinor – British Journal of Educational Psychology, 2007
Background: It is well established that handwriting fluency constrains writing quality by limiting resources for higher order processes such as planning and reviewing. According to the "simple view of writing" then slow keyboarding speed should hinder the quality of keyboarded essay compositions in the same way that slow handwriting…
Descriptors: Keyboarding (Data Entry), Word Processing, Scripts, Childrens Writing
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Lindsay, G. A.; McLennan, D. – British Journal of Educational Psychology, 1983
Two pieces of free writing by children six to nine years old were rated for creativity and legibility. Creativity was found to be unaffected by the type of paper (lined or unlined) used. However, young children's legibility was greater with unlined paper, while the opposite was true of the older children. (Author/GC)
Descriptors: Creativity, Elementary Education, Handwriting, Paper (Material)
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Christensen, Carol A. – British Journal of Educational Psychology, 2004
Background: Orthographic-motor integration refers to the way in which orthographic knowledge is integrated with fine-motor demands of handwriting. A strong relationship has shown to exist between orthographic-motor integration and students' ability to produce creative and well-structured written text (De La Paz & Graham, 1995). This…
Descriptors: Grade 8, Written Language, Semantics, Intervention