Descriptor
Source
Higher Education Management | 34 |
Author
Kells, Herb R. | 3 |
Linke, Russell D. | 2 |
Ahgren-Lange, Ulla | 1 |
Bambenek, Joseph J. | 1 |
Bormans, Ronald | 1 |
De Greve, J. P. | 1 |
El-Khawas, Elaine | 1 |
Fernandez, Juan | 1 |
Frijdal, A. | 1 |
Garcia, Pedro | 1 |
Haslam, Cheryl | 1 |
More ▼ |
Publication Type
Journal Articles | 34 |
Reports - Evaluative | 19 |
Reports - Descriptive | 13 |
Opinion Papers | 6 |
Guides - Non-Classroom | 2 |
Reports - Research | 2 |
Information Analyses | 1 |
Speeches/Meeting Papers | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
Administrators | 26 |
Practitioners | 26 |
Location
Australia | 3 |
Spain | 3 |
United Kingdom | 3 |
Canada | 2 |
Finland | 2 |
Mexico | 1 |
Netherlands | 1 |
Portugal | 1 |
Sweden | 1 |
Switzerland | 1 |
United Kingdom (Great Britain) | 1 |
More ▼ |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating

Kogan, Maurice – Higher Education Management, 1994
An international group evaluated the University of Jyvaskyla (Finland) following university self-evaluation. This paper discusses initiation and ownership of the evaluation process, the nature of the process within the university, the impact on the university, and the wider impact. It compares self-evaluation with other approaches and comments on…
Descriptors: Consultants, Educational Assessment, Evaluation Methods, Foreign Countries

De Greve, J. P.; Frijdal, A. – Higher Education Management, 1989
A method for evaluating research using both quantitative and qualitative analysis is presented. It is proposed as useful for a variety of evaluation needs including large-scale projects, acquisition of expensive equipment, and nomination of scientists to important positions. It is seen as especially useful for evaluation in small entities. (MSE)
Descriptors: Evaluation Criteria, Evaluation Methods, Higher Education, Peer Evaluation

McDaniel, Olaf C. – Higher Education Management, 1996
A study of the use of performance indicators in assessing the quality of higher education investigated the potential contribution to quality control of 17 indicators. It is concluded that of the 17, only 7 have high or medium impact, while 10 have low to marginal impact. Concerns regarding government use of performance indicators intended for…
Descriptors: College Administration, Educational Quality, Evaluation Criteria, Evaluation Methods

Spruyt, Eric H. J.; And Others – Higher Education Management, 1996
A study at the University of Antwerp (Belgium) investigated the ethics, sensitivity, and reliability of bibliographic methods to assess faculty research productivity. Such methods measure the impact of a university research group by counting the times the group's publications are cited by other authors. Results suggest that this quantitative…
Descriptors: Citation Analysis, College Administration, College Faculty, Evaluation Methods

Sallinen, Aino; And Others – Higher Education Management, 1994
A quality assessment at the University of Jyvaskyla (Finland) started with self-evaluation followed by a foreign visiting group's evaluation. The positive effects of the evaluation were commitment, organizational self-understanding, a new frame of planning activities, future orientation, and a new position in external relations. (Author/JDD)
Descriptors: Consultants, Educational Assessment, Evaluation Methods, Foreign Countries

Stolte-Heiskanen, Veronica – Higher Education Management, 1992
The use of performance evaluation and performance indicators in Finland is reviewed, and a study of Finnish researchers' perceptions and attitudes about them is discussed. Three conclusions emerged from the study: (1) departmental indicators should be developed; (2) publications are not a bad measure of performance; and (3) most scientists support…
Descriptors: Accountability, College Administration, Evaluation Criteria, Evaluation Methods

Lajes, Maria Alcina Almeida – Higher Education Management, 1995
A discussion of quality assurance in Portuguese universities looks at the environment of expanding enrollments and new laws concerning program quality. It is proposed that evaluation should be informative, exhaustive, and concise, and should involve cooperation between evaluators both internal and external to the institution. (MSE)
Descriptors: College Administration, Educational Quality, Evaluation Methods, Foreign Countries

Kells, Herb R. – Higher Education Management, 1992
A discussion of institutional and program evaluation in higher education focuses on the need for congruence between the purposes of the assessment and the procedures used to accomplish it. The factors relating to success in evaluation are examined, with special attention given to those that promote improvement. (Author/MSE)
Descriptors: College Administration, College Outcomes Assessment, Evaluation Criteria, Evaluation Methods

El-Khawas, Elaine – Higher Education Management, 1995
A discussion of external evaluation of a college or university program or unit looks at two different approaches used in the United States for accreditation purposes--standards of good practice and competency-based learning and review. Methods of maintaining consistency and eliminating bias are examined briefly. (MSE)
Descriptors: Bias, College Administration, Educational Quality, Evaluation Criteria

Garcia, Pedro; And Others – Higher Education Management, 1995
A recently implemented program of institutional evaluation in Spanish universities, designed with the intention of improving the quality of teaching, research, and administration, is discussed. Objectives and mechanisms for assessment in each of these areas are detailed. (MSE)
Descriptors: College Administration, Educational Quality, Evaluation Methods, Experimental Programs

Lucier, Pierre – Higher Education Management, 1992
A Canadian public higher education official comments on the use of performance indicators for evaluating and funding higher education institutions. Focus is on putting the controversy over their use into perspective by narrowing the issues and arguments, clarifying them, and acknowledging inherent limitations of performance indicators. (MSE)
Descriptors: College Administration, Conflict Resolution, Evaluation Criteria, Evaluation Methods

Massaro, Vin – Higher Education Management, 1995
The quality assessment process for Australian universities is examined, including its impact on quality improvement, whether judging quality at the institutional level is too coarse a measure to give accurate results, some alternatives, and whether the whole institution approach may lead to greater external interference in institutional affairs.…
Descriptors: College Administration, Educational Quality, Evaluation Criteria, Evaluation Methods

Valimaa, Jussi – Higher Education Management, 1994
Interviews with 24 academics and 2 students in 3 Finnish universities examined their attitudes toward quality assessment, the most appropriate assessment unit, connection of assessment and decision making, the value of peer review, and the issue of "bad" teaching. In general, attitudes toward quality assessment were positive. (JDD)
Descriptors: College Faculty, College Instruction, Decision Making, Educational Assessment

Kells, Herb R. – Higher Education Management, 1991
This article discusses the use of incentives for higher education institutions to become more efficient, effective, and responsive to government policies and offers examples of positive and negative incentives, the nature of relevant incentives, and the relationship between incentives and professional preferences. Suggestions for using incentives…
Descriptors: Change Strategies, College Administration, Educational Change, Efficiency

Linke, Russell D. – Higher Education Management, 1992
Australia's recent experience with performance indicators for evaluation and funding of higher education institutions suggests principles concerning: selecting appropriate, relevant, and reliable indicators; providing expert judgment in interpretation of indicators; considering institutional context and priorities; providing incentives for good…
Descriptors: College Administration, College Role, Evaluation Criteria, Evaluation Methods