NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing all 4 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Saleh Alhazbi; Afnan Al-ali; Aliya Tabassum; Abdulla Al-Ali; Ahmed Al-Emadi; Tamer Khattab; Mahmood A. Hasan – Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 2024
Background: Measuring students' self-regulation skills is essential to understand how they approach their learning tasks in order to identify areas where they might need additional support. Traditionally, self-report questionnaires and think aloud protocols have been used to measure self-regulated learning skills (SRL). However, these methods are…
Descriptors: Learning Analytics, Independent Study, Higher Education, College Students
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Karvounidis, T.; Chimos, K.; Bersimis, S.; Douligeris, C. – Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 2014
In this work, Web 2.0 technologies in higher education are evaluated using students' perceptions, satisfaction, performance and behaviour. The study evaluates the Web 2.0 tools as stand-alone entities as well in terms of their cross-operability and integration (confluence) to synergistic contributions towards the enhancement of student…
Descriptors: Web 2.0 Technologies, Computer Software Evaluation, Higher Education, Student Attitudes
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Bannert, Maria – Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 2000
This paper focuses on the effectiveness and feasibility of two different kinds of individual learners' support in software training in undergraduate classroom settings. Describes varied user interfaces, including a training wheels interface; compares tutor instruction versus self-learning material; and considers learning time, learning outcomes,…
Descriptors: Comparative Analysis, Computer Interfaces, Computer Software, Higher Education
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
McMahon, J.; Gardner, J.; Gray, C.; Mulhern, G. – Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 1999
Describes a longitudinal study of college students in the United Kingdom that examined factors affecting computer use. Results show situational factors, including access, training, and time, affect student computer use, but academic staff tend to focus on the needs of their department and should focus more on the student perspective. (Author/LRW)
Descriptors: Access to Computers, Computer Assisted Instruction, Focus Groups, Foreign Countries