Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 0 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 1 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 1 |
Descriptor
Source
New Directions for Teaching… | 7 |
Author
Svinicki, Marilla D. | 2 |
Braskamp, Lawrence A. | 1 |
Kallison, James M., Jr. | 1 |
Kenney, Patricia Ann | 1 |
Knapper, Christopher | 1 |
Ory, John C. | 1 |
Piccinin, Sergio | 1 |
Skill, Thomas D. | 1 |
Young, Brian A. | 1 |
Publication Type
Journal Articles | 7 |
Opinion Papers | 4 |
Information Analyses | 2 |
Reports - Descriptive | 2 |
Education Level
Higher Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Svinicki, Marilla D. – New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 2017
As faculty and faculty developers, we sometimes forget that the principles of learning and motivation that we apply to students also apply to us. This chapter illustrates how the MVP model can be used to create effective faculty development activities.
Descriptors: Faculty Development, Educational Practices, Teaching Models, Learning Activities

Knapper, Christopher; Piccinin, Sergio – New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 1999
This introduction to a special issue on using consultants to improve teaching in higher education considers the origins and rationale for instructional consulting, raises some questions about the conceptual underpinnings for consulting practice, examines who offers and who sells consultation, and urges training in consultation skills and greater…
Descriptors: Consultation Programs, Higher Education, Instructional Improvement, Teaching Models

Braskamp, Lawrence A. – New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 2000
Braskamp uses four questions to focus his discussion on the improvement of faculty evaluation: (1) Why do we assess? (2) What are the standards and criteria of quality and effectiveness? (3) What do we assess? (4) How do we assess? (JM)
Descriptors: Educational Principles, Faculty Development, Faculty Evaluation, Higher Education

Ory, John C. – New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 2000
Ory emphasizes four processes in assessing faculty: examining the craft of teaching; faculty members reflecting on the quality of and standards for their work; receiving feedback from others with the expectation that faculty will improve and assessing the work of others by focusing on the value of the work. (JM)
Descriptors: Educational Practices, Educational Principles, Faculty Development, Faculty Evaluation

Skill, Thomas D.; Young, Brian A. – New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 2002
Discusses the seven popular Wingspread Principles (principles for good practice in undergraduate education) in terms of their implications for learning spaces, both physical and virtual. (EV)
Descriptors: Classroom Design, Educational Facilities Design, Higher Education, Learning Theories

Kenney, Patricia Ann; Kallison, James M., Jr. – New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 1994
Two studies of the effectiveness of supplemental instruction (SI) for college-level calculus courses are reported. In each, achievement was compared for students whose discussion groups were conducted using the supplemental instruction (SI) model and those whose discussion groups were conducted with traditional content-only focus. In both cases,…
Descriptors: Academic Achievement, Achievement Gains, Calculus, College Instruction

Svinicki, Marilla D. – New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 1999
Reviews recent research on student learning and motivation and applies conclusions to college instruction. Examines findings and instructional implications of the behaviorist model, the cognitive model, metacognition, learner-centered models, the unique learner, and motivation from a learning perspective. Concludes that the biggest variable in…
Descriptors: College Instruction, Higher Education, Learning Processes, Metacognition