NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing all 6 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Stokes, Joseph; And Others – Small Group Behavior, 1983
Dimensions of group self-disclosure, intimacy and immediacy, were examined in two experiments using college student (N=273) subjects who viewed four videotapes of group interactions. Groups in which members made more disclosures about intimate topics were percieved as more cohesive. Higher immediacy, however, was not associated with increased…
Descriptors: Behavior Patterns, College Students, Disclosure, Group Dynamics
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Wimer, Scott; Derlega, Valerian J. – Small Group Behavior, 1983
College students (N=18) participating in personal growth groups completed questionnaires about consistency, consensus, and distinctivenesses of feedback received from the group. Findings argue that consensus is an important variable in determining whether feedback is accepted and in channeling attributions of reasons for why particular feedback is…
Descriptors: Attribution Theory, Behavior Patterns, College Students, Feedback
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Gupta, Mahesh – Small Group Behavior, 1983
Hypothesized that stability of a friendly dyadic interpersonal relationship varies with similarity of perceived views of problems of lasting concern. Students (N=76) at the Indian Institute of Technology completed a three-part questionnaire about friendly relationships, Individual Problem Blank, and Problem Checklist. Results supported the…
Descriptors: Behavior Patterns, College Students, Foreign Countries, Friendship
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Bell, Mae Arnold – Small Group Behavior, 1982
Reports analyses by topical cycle and group meeting of nine videotaped group discussions to extend Bales and Strodtbeck's often cited phase research. The analysis by group meeting suggesting an underlying motivational structure for phase progression, offers support of a three-phase hypothesis. (Author)
Descriptors: Behavior Patterns, College Students, Developmental Stages, Group Dynamics
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Reynolds, Paul D. – Small Group Behavior, 1984
Presents two studies of the influence of group size, prior acquaintance, and gender composition on talking and silence in decision making groups (N=157). Results suggested that friends talked more than strangers, and leaders talked more than nonleaders. Group differences were reflected more dramatically in patterns of silence. (JAC)
Descriptors: Behavior Patterns, College Students, Decision Making, Group Discussion
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
DeStephen, Rolayne S. – Small Group Behavior, 1983
Analyzed the complete interaction of high and low consensus groups in a basic small group course. Interaction analysis indicated that both the relational and content levels of communication are significantly different for high versus low consensus groups. The conclusion that increased feedback leads to decision satisfaction was confirmed. (JAC)
Descriptors: Behavior Patterns, Communication (Thought Transfer), Comparative Testing, Decision Making