Descriptor
Ability Identification | 4 |
Adaptive Testing | 4 |
Computer Assisted Testing | 4 |
Higher Education | 4 |
College Students | 3 |
Comparative Testing | 3 |
Item Response Theory | 3 |
Difficulty Level | 2 |
Item Banks | 2 |
Statistics | 2 |
Test Anxiety | 2 |
More ▼ |
Publication Type
Reports - Research | 4 |
Speeches/Meeting Papers | 3 |
Journal Articles | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating

Halkitis, Perry N. – Journal of Outcome Measurement, 1998
The precision of a computerized adaptive test (CAT) with a limited item pool was measured using test results from 4,494 nursing students. Regardless of the item pool size, CAT provides greater precision in measurement with a smaller number of items administered even when the choice of items is limited, but CAT fails to achieve equiprecision along…
Descriptors: Ability Identification, Adaptive Testing, College Students, Computer Assisted Testing
Wise, Steven L.; And Others – 1991
According to item response theory (IRT), examinee ability estimation is independent of the particular set of test items administered from a calibrated pool. Although the most popular application of this feature of IRT is computerized adaptive (CA) testing, a recently proposed alternative is self-adapted (SA) testing, in which examinees choose the…
Descriptors: Ability Identification, Adaptive Testing, College Students, Comparative Testing
Roos, Linda L.; And Others – 1992
Computerized adaptive (CA) testing uses an algorithm to match examinee ability to item difficulty, while self-adapted (SA) testing allows the examinee to choose the difficulty of his or her items. Research comparing SA and CA testing has shown that examinees experience lower anxiety and improved performance with SA testing. All previous research…
Descriptors: Ability Identification, Adaptive Testing, Algebra, Algorithms
Lunz, Mary E.; And Others – 1990
This study explores the test-retest consistency of computer adaptive tests of varying lengths. The testing model used was designed as a mastery model to determine whether an examinee's estimated ability level is above or below a pre-established criterion expressed in the metric (logits) of the calibrated item pool scale. The Rasch model was used…
Descriptors: Ability Identification, Adaptive Testing, College Students, Comparative Testing