Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 0 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 4 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 7 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 9 |
Descriptor
Comparative Analysis | 20 |
Evaluators | 20 |
Higher Education | 20 |
Evaluation Methods | 7 |
College Faculty | 5 |
Evaluation Criteria | 5 |
Foreign Countries | 5 |
Interrater Reliability | 4 |
Decision Making | 3 |
Educational Quality | 3 |
Ethics | 3 |
More ▼ |
Source
Author
Bosch, Emma | 1 |
Brown, Robert D. | 1 |
Burset, Silvia | 1 |
Chambers, Lucy | 1 |
Chen, Sunny | 1 |
Childress, Cameron | 1 |
Flores, Kathryn Younger | 1 |
González, Vicenta | 1 |
Hattendorf, Lynn C. | 1 |
Hirschi, Melissa | 1 |
Hsu, Lung-hsun | 1 |
More ▼ |
Publication Type
Reports - Research | 17 |
Journal Articles | 12 |
Speeches/Meeting Papers | 4 |
Reports - Evaluative | 3 |
Tests/Questionnaires | 2 |
Collected Works - Proceedings | 1 |
Numerical/Quantitative Data | 1 |
Education Level
Higher Education | 9 |
Postsecondary Education | 7 |
Two Year Colleges | 2 |
Audience
Researchers | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Higher Education Act 1965 | 1 |
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Vidal Rodeiro, Carmen; Chambers, Lucy – Research Matters, 2022
Many high-stakes qualifications include non-exam assessments that are marked by teachers. Awarding bodies then apply a moderation process to bring the marking of these assessments to an agreed standard. Comparative Judgement (CJ) is a technique where two (or more) pieces of work are compared at a time, allowing an overall rank order of work to be…
Descriptors: Evaluation Methods, Portfolios (Background Materials), Decision Making, Task Analysis
Jenkins, Daniel M.; Rocco, Melissa L. – Journal of Leadership Education, 2022
Program reviews are standard practice in higher education. Yet, due to the infancy of the leadership discipline, little is known about the process of conducting reviews of leadership programs. Through interviewing 13 experienced leadership program reviewers in both curricular and co-curricular contexts, the authors of this study aim to address…
Descriptors: Leadership Training, Program Evaluation, Higher Education, Evaluators
Myers, Marie J. – Bulgarian Comparative Education Society, 2020
Academic reviews take on new directions in an ever-increasing fast-paced development. Unit reviewers should be provided different samples, with varied cultural contents also providing nuances, as related to the 'object' of the evaluation, as well as a final overall product, i.e. more of a synthesis, through which one will check the degree of…
Descriptors: Educational Quality, Quality Assurance, Cultural Awareness, Evaluation Methods
Romeo, Marina; Yepes-Baldó, Montserrat; González, Vicenta; Burset, Silvia; Martín, Carolina; Bosch, Emma – International Journal of Instruction, 2022
The assessment process in higher education considers four aspects: assessment agents, procedure, content, and scoring. In this study, we delve into the who. We analyze the role of transversal competence assessment agents in the framework of professional internships in university master's degree programs, comparing the suitability of their…
Descriptors: Internship Programs, Higher Education, Evaluators, Masters Programs
Childress, Cameron; Ward, James Dean; Pisacreta, Elizabeth Davidson; Chen, Sunny – ITHAKA S+R, 2022
The accreditation process and the federal role in shaping it are clearly of critical importance for ensuring all students have access to quality postsecondary options. And yet, due to the complexity of the relationship among the federal government, accreditors, and institutions, and the opacity of the accreditation process itself, there is little…
Descriptors: Government Role, Accreditation (Institutions), Access to Education, Educational Quality
Huang, Lan-fen; Kubelec, Simon; Keng, Nicole; Hsu, Lung-hsun – Language Testing in Asia, 2018
Background: Although teachers of English are required to assess students' speaking proficiency in the Common European Framework of Reference for Languages (CEFR), their ability to rate is seldom evaluated. The application of descriptors in the assessment of English speaking on CEFR in the context of English as a foreign language has not often been…
Descriptors: Evaluators, Second Language Learning, Second Language Instruction, English (Second Language)
Ocean, Mia; Hirschi, Melissa – Community College Journal of Research and Practice, 2016
It is currently unknown how many Institutional Review Boards (IRBs) exist at community colleges. This study investigates the percentage of public and Tribal community colleges that have active IRBs. It also examines the potential relationships between states that allow community colleges to confer baccalaureate degrees, or that have articulation…
Descriptors: Tribally Controlled Education, Community Colleges, Evaluators, Experiments
Huber, Amy Mattingly; Leigh, Katharine E.; Tremblay, Kenneth R., Jr. – College Student Journal, 2012
The creative process is a multifaceted and dynamic path of thinking required to execute a project in design-based disciplines. The goal of this research was to test a model outlining the creative design process by investigating student experiences in a design project assignment. The study used an exploratory design to collect data from student…
Descriptors: Interior Design, Creativity, Creative Thinking, Evaluators
Qian, David D. – Language Assessment Quarterly, 2009
In recent decades, with an increasing application of computer technology to the delivery of oral language proficiency assessment, there have been renewed debates over the appropriateness of two different testing modes, namely, (a) face-to-face, or direct, testing, and (b) person-to-machine, or semi-direct, testing. Previous research conducted in…
Descriptors: Oral Language, Testing, Computers, Foreign Countries

Hull, Alan L. – Evaluation and the Health Professions, 1982
One aspect of the validity of medical students' clinical performance ratings are studied. It is demonstrated that there are higher correlations between house officer ratings of student knowledge and cognitive ability scores than between attending staff evaluations and student ability scores. (Author/GK)
Descriptors: Achievement Rating, Clinical Experience, Comparative Analysis, Evaluators
Sireci, Stephen G.; Rizavi, Saba – 2000
Although computer-based testing is becoming popular, many of these tests are limited to the use of selected-response item formats due to the difficulty in mechanically scoring constructed-response items. This limitation is unfortunate because many constructs, such as writing proficiency, can be measured more directly using items that require…
Descriptors: College Students, Comparative Analysis, Computer Uses in Education, Essay Tests

Newman, Dianna L.; Brown, Robert D. – Evaluation Review, 1992
Survey items representing 30 standards of the Joint Committee on Standards for Educational Evaluation were used to examine violations in program evaluations. Twenty-nine novice graduate students, 57 graduate students with moderate knowledge about evaluation, and 61 expert evaluators viewed propriety and accuracy standards as suffering the most…
Descriptors: Comparative Analysis, Educational Assessment, Ethics, Evaluation Criteria

Magnan, Sally Sieloff – Canadian Modern Language Review, 1987
Differences in procedures used by academic institutions and government agencies in administering the American Council on the Teaching of Foreign Languages' Oral Proficiency Interview test are examined, and results and implications of two studies of interrater reliability are discussed. (MSE)
Descriptors: Comparative Analysis, Correlation, Evaluation Methods, Evaluators
Wood, Peter H. – 1978
Faculty of the education department of a midwestern university were rated as teachers by both students and peers, and ranked by peers as to their effectiveness in service and research. Student ratings were gathered from three questions on The Student Description of Teaching form, which concerned assessment of the teacher, the is appended. Access…
Descriptors: Bias, College Faculty, Comparative Analysis, Evaluation Criteria
Flores, Kathryn Younger – 1995
This paper presents preliminary, but statistically significant, findings from a study that compares two methods of measuring instructional effectiveness: global evaluation by experts and systematic observation using the SCRIBE Ob.2 software developed at the University of Texas at Austin. Hierarchical instruction of a performance skill…
Descriptors: Classroom Observation Techniques, College Faculty, Comparative Analysis, Computer Assisted Testing
Previous Page | Next Page »
Pages: 1 | 2