NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Publication Date
In 20250
Since 20240
Since 2021 (last 5 years)0
Since 2016 (last 10 years)0
Since 2006 (last 20 years)2
Education Level
Higher Education2
Location
Georgia1
Japan1
Laws, Policies, & Programs
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Showing 1 to 15 of 37 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
PDF on ERIC Download full text
Zhou, Wenyi; Simpson, Elizabeth; Domizi, Denise Pinette – International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 2012
Google Docs, an online word processing application, is a promising tool for collaborative learning. However, many college instructors and students lack knowledge to effectively use Google Docs to enhance teaching and learning. Goals of this study include (1) assessing the effectiveness of using Google Docs in an out-of-class collaborative writing…
Descriptors: Assignments, Word Processing, Collaborative Writing, Undergraduate Students
Oliver, Ron – Journal of Computer-Based Instruction, 1993
Compares the performance of novice computer users and users with significant proofreading experience in proofreading from screen and paper. Results showed that the users with previous experience did better in the screen mode, but no difference between the groups was evident in the paper mode. (Contains 22 references.) (JLB)
Descriptors: Comparative Analysis, Editing, Error Correction, Experience
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Rubens, Philip – Technical Communication, 1991
Compares the time required to perform four tasks on the basis of information gleaned from a traditional manual and from a hypertext version of the same manual. Finds that searches in the paper document were significantly faster than those in hypertext. Suggests that direct importation of existing word-processing files into hypertext format is not…
Descriptors: Comparative Analysis, Higher Education, Hypermedia, Reading Comprehension
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Harrington, Susanmarie; Shermis, Mark D.; Rollins, Angela L. – Computers and Composition, 2000
Considers whether differences might emerge in writing quality when students wrote examinations by hand or on a computer, and whether raters differed in their evaluation of essays written by hand, on a computer, or by hand and then transcribed to typed form before scoring. Finds no statistically significant differences in ratings among the three…
Descriptors: Comparative Analysis, Higher Education, Student Placement, Testing
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Barker, Randolph T.; Pearce, C. Glenn – Journal of Educational Computing Research, 1995
Analyzed 17 personal attributes of 160 undergraduate students who wrote reports on a computer or by hand, and compared differences in the quality of computer and handwritten reports with each student's personal attributes. Concludes that some attributes do relate to computer writing quality. (JMV)
Descriptors: Comparative Analysis, Handwriting, Higher Education, Personality Traits
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Pearce, C. Glenn; Barker, Randolph T. – Journal of Business Communication, 1991
Compares undergraduates' handwritten reports with those written on computers for 10 precisely defined quality factors. Finds more similarities than differences, with 6 of the 10 tests showing no significant differences. Notes that this study does not support a general conclusion that basic writing quality will improve in computer written…
Descriptors: Business Communication, Comparative Analysis, Higher Education, Word Processing
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Collier, Richard; Werier, Clifford – Computers and Composition, 1995
Reviews videotapes of three professional writers composing several essays from start to finish, both by hand and by computer. Discusses similarities and differences among the completed essays. Finds that writing appears to be governed by deep cognitive models that are little influenced by the mode of text production or by the writer's preference…
Descriptors: Comparative Analysis, Higher Education, Word Processing, Writing (Composition)
Kellogg, Ronald T.; Mueller, Suzanne – 1989
A study examined whether word processing amplifies writing performance and whether it restructures the process of writing. Sixteen college students wrote a short essay in a single session on either a word processor or in longhand. The quality of the essays was assessed by trained judges who rated their content and style. Text analysis methods were…
Descriptors: Cognitive Structures, Comparative Analysis, Computers, Higher Education
Haas, Christina; Hayes, John R. – 1986
A study was conducted to replicate partially John Gould's study using more advanced machines and editors, and to test several of Colette Daiute's hypotheses about writing with the computer. Gould's study indicated that expert writers using text editors required 50% more time to compose on text editors than on hard copy, and the extra time did not…
Descriptors: Comparative Analysis, Higher Education, Microcomputers, Research Methodology
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Dierckins, Tony – Computers and Composition, 1994
Examines argumentative and research papers written by students using Macintoshes in comparison to those written using IBM-compatibles. Finds that differences are not large enough to justify claims that the use of a graphical user interface affects writing skills. Suggests that rapid changes in technology makes the issue moot. (RS)
Descriptors: Comparative Analysis, Computer Interfaces, Computer System Design, Higher Education
Davis, Wes; Mahoney, Kelley – 1999
This paper reports the results and educational implications of an experimental, comparative study evaluating the gains in overall writing quality in two groups of college freshmen composition students. The experimental group of 45 students learned to compose their first four of eight essays on the computer, while their professor intervened with…
Descriptors: Comparative Analysis, Computers, Feedback, Freshman Composition
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Slattery, Patrick J.; Kowalski, Rosemary – Computers and Composition, 1998
Suggests that when first-year students composed on screen, they developed a tendency to expand their writing processes; and that when upper-level students did, they tended to collapse their processes. Suggests that first-year and upper-level students interacting with a computer can learn and adopt different types of writing strategies. (SR)
Descriptors: College Freshmen, College Juniors, Comparative Analysis, Higher Education
Giovannini, Mary – 1982
Seventy students in a college business communications course participated in a study to determine whether there were significant differences in students' attitudes toward the course when the traditional writing method or the word processing method was used. The study also sought to ascertain whether the traditional writing method developed a…
Descriptors: Business Communication, Business Correspondence, Business Education, College Students
de Byl, Penny; Taylor, Janet – Online Submission, 2007
This paper explores the Web 2.0 ethos with respect to the application of pedagogy within 3D online virtual environments. 3D worlds can create a synthetic experience capturing the essence of "being" in a particular world or context. The AliveX3D platform adopts the Web 2.0 ethos and applies it to online 3D virtual environment forming a Web…
Descriptors: Internet, Web Based Instruction, Computer Uses in Education, Learning Experience
Brock, Mark N. – 1988
An investigation of two approaches to individualized computer-assisted instruction in ESL (English as a Second Language) was conducted. One treatment group, consisting of two university students, received exclusively product-oriented feedback, while the other group of two students received exclusively process-oriented feedback. In the…
Descriptors: Comparative Analysis, Computer Assisted Instruction, English (Second Language), Expert Systems
Previous Page | Next Page ยป
Pages: 1  |  2  |  3