Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 0 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 0 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 5 |
Descriptor
Adaptive Testing | 104 |
Computer Assisted Testing | 104 |
Higher Education | 104 |
College Students | 38 |
Test Items | 32 |
Test Construction | 22 |
Test Anxiety | 20 |
Difficulty Level | 19 |
Item Response Theory | 19 |
Comparative Analysis | 18 |
Comparative Testing | 16 |
More ▼ |
Source
Author
Wise, Steven L. | 10 |
Vispoel, Walter P. | 6 |
Frick, Theodore W. | 5 |
Reckase, Mark D. | 5 |
Weiss, David J. | 5 |
Plake, Barbara S. | 4 |
Bergstrom, Betty A. | 3 |
Lunz, Mary E. | 3 |
Roos, Linda L. | 3 |
Shermis, Mark D. | 3 |
Buhr, Dianne C. | 2 |
More ▼ |
Publication Type
Education Level
Higher Education | 6 |
Postsecondary Education | 2 |
Elementary Secondary Education | 1 |
Location
United Kingdom | 3 |
Canada | 2 |
Florida | 1 |
Saudi Arabia | 1 |
South Korea | 1 |
Turkey | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Barker, Trevor – Electronic Journal of e-Learning, 2011
The recent National Students Survey showed that feedback to students was an ongoing problem in Higher Education. This paper reports on the extension of our past research into the provision of automated feedback for objective testing. In the research presented here, the system has been further developed for marking practical and essay questions and…
Descriptors: Feedback (Response), Evaluation, Adaptive Testing, Objective Tests
Stowell, Jeffrey R.; Bennett, Dan – Journal of Educational Computing Research, 2010
Increased use of course management software to administer course exams online for face-to-face classes raises the question of how well test anxiety and other emotions generalize from the classroom to an online setting. We hypothesized that administering regular course exams in an online format would reduce test anxiety experienced at the time of…
Descriptors: Test Anxiety, Computer Assisted Testing, Computer Uses in Education, Educational Technology

Roos, Linda L.; And Others – Educational and Psychological Measurement, 1997
The importance of item feedback in self-adapted testing was studied by comparing feedback and no feedback conditions for computerized adaptive tests and self-adapted tests taken by 363 college students. Results indicate that item feedback is not necessary to realize score differences between self-adapted and computerized adaptive testing. (SLD)
Descriptors: Adaptive Testing, College Students, Computer Assisted Testing, Feedback

McKinley, Robert L.; Reckase, Mark D. – AEDS Journal, 1980
Describes tailored testing (in which a computer selects appropriate items from an item bank while an examinee is taking a test) and shows it to be superior to paper-and-pencil tests in such areas as reliability, security, and appropriateness of items. (IRT)
Descriptors: Adaptive Testing, Computer Assisted Testing, Higher Education, Program Evaluation

Neuman, George; Baydoun, Ramzi – Applied Psychological Measurement, 1998
Studied the cross-mode equivalence of paper-and-pencil and computer-based clerical tests with 141 undergraduates. Found no differences across modes for the two types of tests. Differences can be minimized when speeded computerized tests follow the same administration and response procedures as the paper format. (SLD)
Descriptors: Adaptive Testing, Comparative Analysis, Computer Assisted Testing, Higher Education

Vispoel, Walter P. – Journal of Educational Measurement, 1998
Compared results from computer-adaptive and self-adaptive tests under conditions in which item review was and was not permitted for 379 college students. Results suggest that, when given the opportunity, most examinees will change answers, but usually only to a small portion of items, resulting in some benefit to the test taker. (SLD)
Descriptors: Adaptive Testing, College Students, Computer Assisted Testing, Higher Education
Patience, Wayne M.; Reckase, Mark D. – 1978
The feasibility of implementing self-paced computerized tailored testing evaluation methods in an undergraduate measurement and evaluation course, and possible differences in achievement levels under a paced versus self-paced testing schedule were investigated. A maximum likelihood tailored testing procedure based on the simple logistic model had…
Descriptors: Academic Achievement, Achievement Tests, Adaptive Testing, Computer Assisted Testing
Schafer, William D; Johnson, Charles E. – 1985
This paper presents examples of effective uses of microcomputers to support basic statistics instruction. All programs are written in Applesoft BASIC for Apple II Plus microcomputers and compatible equipment. They have been field tested in statistics courses at the University of Maryland. Microcomputers can be used with color monitors for…
Descriptors: Adaptive Testing, Computer Assisted Instruction, Computer Assisted Testing, Courseware
Halkitis, Perry N.; Leahy, Julia M. – Nursing and Health Care, 1993
Explains computerized adaptive testing (CAT) and its basis in item response theory. Describes a CAT program in pharmacology. (SK)
Descriptors: Adaptive Testing, Computer Assisted Testing, Higher Education, Individualized Instruction

Vispoel, Walter P.; Hendrickson, Amy B.; Bleiler, Timothy – Journal of Educational Measurement, 2000
Evaluated the effectiveness of vocabulary computerized adaptive tests (CATs) with restricted review in a live testing setting involving 242 college students in which special efforts were made to increase test efficiency and reduce the possibility of obtaining positively biased proficiency estimates. Results suggest the efficacy of allowing limited…
Descriptors: Adaptive Testing, Attitudes, College Students, Computer Assisted Testing

Wise, Steven L.; And Others – Applied Measurement in Education, 1994
The hypothesis that previously found effects of self-adapted testing (SAT) are attributable to examinees' having an increased perception of control over a stressful testing situation was studied with 377 college students who took computerized adaptive tests or SAT. The strongest preference for SAT was seen in individuals with the highest…
Descriptors: Adaptive Testing, College Students, Computer Assisted Testing, Higher Education

Wise, Steven L.; Finney, Sara J.; Enders, Craig K.; Freeman, Sharon A.; Severance, Donald D. – Applied Measurement in Education, 1999
Examined whether providing item review on a computerized adaptive test could be used by examinees to inflate their scores. Two studies involving 139 undergraduates suggest that examinees are not highly proficient at discriminating item difficulty. A simulation study showed the usefulness of a strategy identified by G. Kingsbury (1996) as a way to…
Descriptors: Adaptive Testing, Computer Assisted Testing, Difficulty Level, Higher Education

Mooney, G. A.; Bligh, J. G.; Leinster, S. J. – Medical Teacher, 1998
Presents a system of classification for describing computer-based assessment techniques based on the level of action and educational activity they offer. Illustrates 10 computer-based assessment techniques and discusses their educational value. Contains 14 references. (Author)
Descriptors: Adaptive Testing, Classification, Computer Assisted Testing, Foreign Countries

Vispoel, Walter P. – Journal of Educational Measurement, 1998
Studied effects of administration mode [computer adaptive test (CAT) versus self-adaptive test (SAT)], item-by-item answer feedback, and test anxiety on results from computerized vocabulary tests taken by 293 college students. CATs were more reliable than SATs, and administration time was less when feedback was provided. (SLD)
Descriptors: Adaptive Testing, College Students, Computer Assisted Testing, Feedback

Rocklin, Thomas; O'Donnell, Angela M. – Journal of Educational Psychology, 1987
An experiment was conducted that contrasted a variant of computerized adaptive testing, self-adapted testing, with two traditional tests. Participants completed a self-report of text anxiety and were randomly assigned to take one of the three tests of verbal ability. Subjects generally chose more difficult items as the test progressed. (Author/LMO)
Descriptors: Adaptive Testing, Comparative Testing, Computer Assisted Testing, Difficulty Level