Descriptor
| Higher Education | 3 |
| Learning Processes | 3 |
| Process Approach (Writing) | 3 |
| Writing Processes | 3 |
| Rhetoric | 2 |
| Rhetorical Theory | 2 |
| Writing Instruction | 2 |
| Educational Trends | 1 |
| Freshman Composition | 1 |
| Instructional Effectiveness | 1 |
| Models | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 3 |
| Opinion Papers | 3 |
| Guides - Classroom - Teacher | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewedHeilker, Paul – Rhetoric Review, 1992
Argues that, during writing instruction, students must be given the opportunity to go public with their composing processes. Discusses the theoretical structure of Robert Zoellner's pedagogy, and recommends its use for teaching the writing process. (PRA)
Descriptors: Higher Education, Learning Processes, Process Approach (Writing), Rhetoric
Peer reviewedHatch, Gary Layne – Rhetoric Review, 1992
Asserts that there is a need for writing teachers to reevaluate the metaphors they use to think about composition. Retraces the steps taken by Robert Zoellner in 1969 to reconsider the instrumental metaphors used by composition theories in the 1990s. Offers a criticism of the writing process model proposed by Linda Flower and John Hayes. (PRA)
Descriptors: Higher Education, Learning Processes, Models, Process Approach (Writing)
Hashimoto, I. – Freshman English News, 1989
Argues that little is known about the teaching of writing beyond what good teachers have always known: that some students learn without teachers; that some students learn if they are given simple assignments, have their papers read with respect, and are taught the few simple things that can be demonstrated simply. (RS)
Descriptors: Educational Trends, Freshman Composition, Higher Education, Instructional Effectiveness


