Descriptor
| Comparative Testing | 4 |
| Higher Education | 4 |
| Models | 4 |
| College Students | 3 |
| Psychometrics | 2 |
| Ability | 1 |
| Adolescent Behavior | 1 |
| Adolescents | 1 |
| Age Differences | 1 |
| Behavior Patterns | 1 |
| Computer Assisted Testing | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Publication Type
| Reports - Research | 4 |
| Journal Articles | 3 |
| Speeches/Meeting Papers | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewedMacLeod, Colin M.; And Others – Intelligence, 1986
Field dependence and spatial ability are examined as different labels for a common underlying dimension. Sixty college students completed two tests of field dependence and two tests of spatial ability. Results of an analysis of covariance found no evidence to view the two traits as distinct from each other. (Author/LMO)
Descriptors: College Students, Comparative Testing, Correlation, Field Dependence Independence
Peer reviewedWoltz, Dan J.; Shute, Valerie J. – Intelligence, 1993
Two studies involving 274 Air Force recruits and 163 college students, respectively, investigated the relationship between priming effects and declarative knowledge acquisition within repetitive practice models. Individual differences in repetition-priming effects uniquely predicted learning differences relative to other cognitive measures.…
Descriptors: College Students, Comparative Testing, Computer Assisted Testing, Higher Education
Chang, Lei – 1993
Equivalence in reliability and validity across 4-point and 6-point scales was assessed by fitting different measurement models through confirmatory factor analysis of a multitrait-multimethod covariance matrix. Responses to nine Likert-type items designed to measure perceived quantitative ability, self-perceived usefulness of quantitative…
Descriptors: Ability, Comparative Testing, Education Majors, Graduate Students
Peer reviewedShaw, Daniel S.; And Others – Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 1992
Relative fits of 3 factor-structure models of adolescent reckless behavior were examined using the 10-item Reckless Behavior Questionnaire with 1,357 college and 181 high school students. Both one- and two-factor models were found to be satisfactory representations. Implications of a study of construct validity are discussed. (SLD)
Descriptors: Adolescent Behavior, Adolescents, Age Differences, Behavior Patterns


