Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 0 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 0 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 1 |
Descriptor
Author
Marsh, Herbert W. | 2 |
Byrne, Barbara M. | 1 |
Chang, Lei | 1 |
Daleiden, Eric L. | 1 |
Kremer, John F. | 1 |
Ogletree, August E. | 1 |
Peterson, Gary W. | 1 |
Publication Type
Reports - Research | 5 |
Journal Articles | 4 |
Speeches/Meeting Papers | 2 |
Dissertations/Theses -… | 1 |
Reports - Evaluative | 1 |
Education Level
Higher Education | 1 |
Audience
Researchers | 1 |
Location
Australia | 2 |
Canada | 1 |
Georgia | 1 |
Papua New Guinea | 1 |
Spain | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
Teacher Efficacy Scale | 1 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Ogletree, August E. – ProQuest LLC, 2009
Two needs of Georgia State University Professional Development School Partnerships are to show increases in both student academic achievement and teacher efficacy. The Teacher-Intern-Professor (TIP) Model was designed to address these needs. The TIP model focuses on using the university and school partnership to support Georgia State University…
Descriptors: Control Groups, Quasiexperimental Design, Professional Development Schools, Teacher Effectiveness

Daleiden, Eric L.; And Others – Psychological Assessment, 1996
Results of assessment with 34 children, 35 adolescents, and 40 undergraduates show that State of Mind (SOM) model ratios varied significantly depending on measurement method and self-versus-other condition, although age did not significantly influence SOM ratios, suggesting that the SOM model set point is applicable to children. (SLD)
Descriptors: Adolescents, Age Differences, Children, Diagnostic Tests

Marsh, Herbert W. – Journal of Educational Psychology, 1986
Items from two North American instruments, designed to measure students' evaluation of teaching effectiveness, were administered to university students in different countries. Most of the items were judged by the students to be appropriate and important. Statistical analysis showed strong support for both the convergent and divergent validity of…
Descriptors: College Faculty, Evaluation Methods, Foreign Countries, Higher Education

Marsh, Herbert W.; Byrne, Barbara M. – Multivariate Behavioral Research, 1993
Extensions of the confirmatory factor analysis approach to multitrait-multimethod data are demonstrated, and self-other agreement on multiple dimensions of self-concept are evaluated in 2 studies investigating the ability of significant others to infer multiple dimensions of self-concept for 151 Australian and 941 Canadian college students. (SLD)
Descriptors: College Students, Correlation, Cross Cultural Studies, Factor Structure
Peterson, Gary W. – 1986
Construct validity of a prototype baccalaureate generic problem solving skills test was explored through a structural analysis. The assessment method used three real-life problem situations crossed by six generic skills, namely Decision-Making, Communication, Analysis, Synthesis, Valuing and Execution. There were six written responses for each…
Descriptors: Cognitive Processes, Cognitive Tests, College Students, Factor Analysis
Chang, Lei – 1993
Equivalence in reliability and validity across 4-point and 6-point scales was assessed by fitting different measurement models through confirmatory factor analysis of a multitrait-multimethod covariance matrix. Responses to nine Likert-type items designed to measure perceived quantitative ability, self-perceived usefulness of quantitative…
Descriptors: Ability, Comparative Testing, Education Majors, Graduate Students

Kremer, John F. – Journal of Educational Psychology, 1990
The construct validity of 14 measures used in college faculty personnel decisions was evaluated through a multitrait-multimethod matrix for data from 89 faculty members in 7 departments. The three-pronged model of teaching, research, and service was not validated. Exploratory factor analysis identified five or six behavior domains for evaluation.…
Descriptors: College Faculty, Construct Validity, Educational Research, Evaluation Methods