Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 0 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 1 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 1 |
Descriptor
Higher Education | 3 |
Readability | 3 |
Readability Formulas | 3 |
Statistical Analysis | 3 |
Accreditation (Institutions) | 1 |
Bibliographies | 1 |
College Freshmen | 1 |
College Students | 1 |
Comparative Analysis | 1 |
Competence | 1 |
Content Area Reading | 1 |
More ▼ |
Author
Barker, Kathleen | 1 |
Fox, Dickie Lee | 1 |
Holden, Gary | 1 |
Kuppens, Sofie | 1 |
Rosenberg, Gary | 1 |
Shelby, Annette N. | 1 |
Publication Type
Journal Articles | 2 |
Reports - Research | 2 |
Opinion Papers | 1 |
Education Level
Higher Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
New York (New York) | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
Flesch Kincaid Grade Level… | 1 |
Flesch Reading Ease Formula | 1 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Holden, Gary; Barker, Kathleen; Kuppens, Sofie; Rosenberg, Gary – Research on Social Work Practice, 2017
Purpose: The need for psychometrically sound measurement approaches to social work educational outcomes assessment is increasing. Method: The research reported here describes an original and two replication studies of a new scale (N = 550) designed to assess an individual's self-efficacy regarding social work competencies specified by the Council…
Descriptors: Self Efficacy, Social Work, Competence, Outcomes of Education

Shelby, Annette N. – Management Communication Quarterly, 1992
Identifies major philosophical, methodological, and pedagogical issues in the controversy over the legitimacy and methodology of using statistical measures to assess the readability of documents. Explores the implications of the controversy for using numerical readability measures to assess written documents. Examines the pedagogical implications…
Descriptors: Higher Education, Measurement Techniques, Readability, Readability Formulas
Fox, Dickie Lee – 1977
The study reported in this paper was designed to describe the differences between the reading-difficulty levels of primary textbooks used in first-semester freshman general studies courses and the reading skills of the students enrolled in those courses, and to compare the Flesch Reading Ease Formula with the SMOG Grading Formula. Separate…
Descriptors: Bibliographies, College Freshmen, Comparative Analysis, Content Area Reading