NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Audience
Researchers3
Laws, Policies, & Programs
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Showing 1 to 15 of 30 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
PDF on ERIC Download full text
Henrietta Carbonel; Angelo Belardi; Jen Ross; Jean-Michel Jullien – Online Learning, 2025
The shift to distance education during the COVID-19 pandemic highlighted the potential and preference of online learners for remote assessment. Yet, concerns about academic integrity, especially with tools like ChatGPT, prompted a reevaluation of remote evaluation methods. Universities responded by returning to on-campus exams or relying on…
Descriptors: Distance Education, Computer Assisted Testing, Student Motivation, Integrity
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
PDF on ERIC Download full text
Latkovska, Tamara; Sidor, Mikhail; Goloyadova, Tetiana; Kalimbet, Andrey – International Journal of Higher Education, 2019
The new national curriculum implementation in the sphere of higher education in Ukraine raises the need for using tests as the means of students' knowledge assessment. The authors have identified the connection both between the level of stress tolerance and between the level of test passing by means of using the correlated analysis, the…
Descriptors: Foreign Countries, Legal Education (Professions), Higher Education, Stress Management
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Stowell, Jeffrey R.; Bennett, Dan – Journal of Educational Computing Research, 2010
Increased use of course management software to administer course exams online for face-to-face classes raises the question of how well test anxiety and other emotions generalize from the classroom to an online setting. We hypothesized that administering regular course exams in an online format would reduce test anxiety experienced at the time of…
Descriptors: Test Anxiety, Computer Assisted Testing, Computer Uses in Education, Educational Technology
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Vispoel, Walter P. – Educational and Psychological Measurement, 2000
Compared results from computerized vocabulary tests under conditions in which item review was permitted or not permitted. Results from 177 college students reveal that performance gains after review were greater for examinees of high ability, and that review was desired more by examinees with higher test anxiety. The major drawback to review was…
Descriptors: Ability, College Students, Computer Assisted Testing, Higher Education
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Wise, Steven L.; And Others – Applied Measurement in Education, 1994
The hypothesis that previously found effects of self-adapted testing (SAT) are attributable to examinees' having an increased perception of control over a stressful testing situation was studied with 377 college students who took computerized adaptive tests or SAT. The strongest preference for SAT was seen in individuals with the highest…
Descriptors: Adaptive Testing, College Students, Computer Assisted Testing, Higher Education
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Ward, Thomas J., Jr.; And Others – Journal of Educational Computing Research, 1989
Discussion of computer-assisted testing focuses on a study of college students that investigated whether a computerized test which incorporated traditional test taking interfaces had any effect on students' performance, anxiety level, or attitudes toward the computer. Results indicate no difference in performance but a significant difference in…
Descriptors: Academic Achievement, Comparative Analysis, Computer Assisted Testing, Higher Education
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Vispoel, Walter P. – Journal of Educational Measurement, 1998
Studied effects of administration mode [computer adaptive test (CAT) versus self-adaptive test (SAT)], item-by-item answer feedback, and test anxiety on results from computerized vocabulary tests taken by 293 college students. CATs were more reliable than SATs, and administration time was less when feedback was provided. (SLD)
Descriptors: Adaptive Testing, College Students, Computer Assisted Testing, Feedback
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Rocklin, Thomas; O'Donnell, Angela M. – Journal of Educational Psychology, 1987
An experiment was conducted that contrasted a variant of computerized adaptive testing, self-adapted testing, with two traditional tests. Participants completed a self-report of text anxiety and were randomly assigned to take one of the three tests of verbal ability. Subjects generally chose more difficult items as the test progressed. (Author/LMO)
Descriptors: Adaptive Testing, Comparative Testing, Computer Assisted Testing, Difficulty Level
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Vogel, Lora Ann – Journal of Educational Computing Research, 1994
Reports on a study conducted to evaluate how individual differences in anxiety levels affect performance on computer versus paper-and-pencil forms of verbal sections of the Graduate Record Examination. Contrary to the research hypothesis, analysis of scores revealed that extroverted and less computer anxious subjects scored significantly lower on…
Descriptors: Comparative Analysis, Computer Anxiety, Computer Assisted Testing, Computer Attitudes
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Shermis, Mark D.; Mzumara, Howard R.; Bublitz, Scott T. – Journal of Educational Computing Research, 2001
This study of undergraduates examined differences between computer adaptive testing (CAT) and self-adaptive testing (SAT), including feedback conditions and gender differences. Results of the Test Anxiety Inventory, Computer Anxiety Rating Scale, and a Student Attitude Questionnaire showed measurement efficiency is differentially affected by test…
Descriptors: Adaptive Testing, Computer Anxiety, Computer Assisted Testing, Gender Issues
PDF pending restoration PDF pending restoration
Plake, Barbara S.; And Others – 1994
In self-adapted testing (SAT), examinees select the difficulty level of items administered. This study investigated three variations of prior information provided when taking an SAT: (1) no information (examinees selected item difficulty levels without prior information); (2) view (examinees inspected a typical item from each difficulty level…
Descriptors: Adaptive Testing, College Students, Computer Assisted Testing, Difficulty Level
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Plake, Barbara S.; And Others – Educational and Psychological Measurement, 1995
No significant differences in performance on a self-adapted test or anxiety were found for college students (n=218) taking a self-adapted test who selected item difficulty without any prior information, inspected an item before selecting, or answered a typical item and received performance feedback. (SLD)
Descriptors: Achievement, Adaptive Testing, College Students, Computer Assisted Testing
Lee, Jo Ann; Hopkins, Lisa – 1985
Subjects for an investigation of the effects of training with a computer and past computer experience on the computerized aptitude test performance of college students were 92 undergraduates at the University of North Carolina at Charlotte, who participated in a test study utilizing six Apple II+ microcomputers. The study was conducted to…
Descriptors: Analysis of Covariance, Aptitude Tests, College Students, Computer Assisted Testing
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Johnson, Phillip L.; And Others – Mid-Western Educational Researcher, 1991
Among 148 college students taking a self-adapted computerized test of basic algebra skills, higher self-confidence and lower test anxiety were related to choosing more difficult first items but were not related to later choices. Overall, examinees chose items of moderate difficulty relative to their ability level. (SV)
Descriptors: Academic Ability, Adaptive Testing, College Students, Computer Assisted Testing
Roos, Linda L.; Wise, Steven L.; Finney, Sara J. – 1998
Previous studies have shown that, when administered a self-adapted test, a few examinees will choose item difficulty levels that are not well-matched to their proficiencies, resulting in high standard errors of proficiency estimation. This study investigated whether the previously observed effects of a self-adapted test--lower anxiety and higher…
Descriptors: Adaptive Testing, College Students, Comparative Analysis, Computer Assisted Testing
Previous Page | Next Page ยป
Pages: 1  |  2