NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing all 12 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Levin, Joel R.; Ferron, John M.; Gafurov, Boris S. – Educational Psychology Review, 2021
Previous simulation studies of randomization tests applied in single-case educational intervention research contexts have typically focused on A-to-B phase changes in means/levels. In the present simulation study, we report the results of two multiple-baseline investigations, one targeting between-phase changes in slopes/trends and the other…
Descriptors: Educational Research, Statistical Analysis, Hypothesis Testing, Intervention
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Onwuegbuzie, Anthony J.; Levin, Joel R.; Ferron, John M. – Journal of Experimental Education, 2011
Building on previous arguments for why educational researchers should not provide effect-size estimates in the face of statistically nonsignificant outcomes (Robinson & Levin, 1997), Onwuegbuzie and Levin (2005) proposed a 3-step statistical approach for assessing group differences when multiple outcome measures are individually analyzed…
Descriptors: Hypothesis Testing, Statistical Analysis, Effect Size, Probability
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Marascuilo, Leonard A.; Levin, Joel R. – American Educational Research Journal, 1976
An alternative is proposed to the usual Interaction and Nested Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) models by which a researcher will be able to investigate both interaction and nested questions in the same experiment without committing Type IV errors. (RC)
Descriptors: Analysis of Variance, Hypothesis Testing, Interaction, Mathematical Models
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Subkoviak, Michael J.; Levin, Joel R. – Journal of Educational Measurement, 1977
Measurement error in dependent variables reduces the power of statistical tests to detect mean differences of specified magnitude. Procedures for determining power and sample size that consider the reliability of the dependent variable are discussed and illustrated. Methods for estimating reliability coefficients used in these procedures are…
Descriptors: Error of Measurement, Hypothesis Testing, Power (Statistics), Sampling
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Betz, M. Austin; Levin, Joel R. – Journal of Educational Statistics, 1982
Logically consistent hypothesis-testing for factorial analysis of variance designs is proposed in the context of a hierarchical model. It is shown that all of the hypotheses associated with the traditional factorial model are conceptually independent and occupy the lowest levels of the hierarchy. (Author/JKS)
Descriptors: Analysis of Variance, Data Analysis, Hypothesis Testing, Models
Levin, Joel R.; Ghatala, Elizabeth S. – Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 1976
In a recently reported study, the functional components of imagery and vocalization strategies in children's verbal discrimination learning were examined, following the combined experimental/correlational logic of Underwood. The present research extends those results to a strategy that (unlike imagery and vocalization) has a positive influence on…
Descriptors: Children, Discrimination Learning, Experimental Psychology, Hypothesis Testing
Levin, Joel R. – Research in the Schools, 1998
Outlines concerns that must be addressed by those who advocate replacing statistical hypothesis-testing with alternative data-analysis strategies. Suggests that commonly recommended alternatives are not perfect and that various hypothesis-testing modifications can be implemented to make the process and its conclusions more credible. Hypothesis…
Descriptors: Data Analysis, Educational Research, Hypothesis Testing, Research Methodology
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Levin, Joel R.; Subkoviak, Michael J. – Applied Psychological Measurement, 1978
Comments (TM 503 706) on an earlier article (TM 503 420) concerning the comparison of the completely randomized design and the randomized block design are acknowledged and appreciated. In addition, potentially misleading notions arising from these comments are addressed and clarified. (See also TM 503 708). (Author/CTM)
Descriptors: Analysis of Variance, Error of Measurement, Hypothesis Testing, Reliability
Levin, Joel R.; Marascuilo, Leonard A. – 1971
Marascuilo and Levin's (1970) notion of Type IV errors is extended, with respect to the interpretation of interactions in analysis of variance (ANOVA) designs. To help clarity what an interaction is and what it is not, in terms of the ANOVA model, the following points are made: (i) interactions should be thought of as linear contrasts involving…
Descriptors: Analysis of Variance, Behavioral Science Research, Evaluation Methods, Hypothesis Testing
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Levin, Joel R.; Subkoviak, Michael J. – Applied Psychological Measurement, 1977
Textbook calculations of statistical power or sample size follow from formulas that assume that the variables under consideration are measured without error. However, in the real world of behavioral research, errors of measurement cannot be neglected. The determination of sample size is discussed, and an example illustrates blocking strategy.…
Descriptors: Analysis of Covariance, Analysis of Variance, Error of Measurement, Hypothesis Testing
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
PDF on ERIC Download full text
Onwuegbuzie, Anthony J.; Levin, Joel R.; Leech, Nancy L. – Learning Disabilities: A Contemporary Journal, 2003
Because of criticisms leveled at statistical hypothesis testing, some researchers have argued that measures of effect size should replace the significance-testing practice. We contend that although effect-size measures have logical appeal, they are also associated with a number of limitations that may result in problematic interpretations of them…
Descriptors: Intervals, Psychological Studies, Learning Disabilities, Testing
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Levin, Joel R.; And Others – Journal of Experimental Education, 1993
Journal editors respond to criticisms of reliance on statistical significance in research reporting. Joel R. Levin ("Journal of Educational Psychology") defends its use, whereas William D. Schafer ("Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development") emphasizes the distinction between statistically significant and important. William Asher…
Descriptors: Editing, Editors, Educational Assessment, Educational Research