Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 0 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 0 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 3 |
Descriptor
Individual Testing | 12 |
Test Validity | 8 |
Intelligence Tests | 5 |
Predictive Validity | 3 |
Primary Education | 3 |
Test Items | 3 |
Bayesian Statistics | 2 |
Group Testing | 2 |
Item Analysis | 2 |
Item Response Theory | 2 |
Preschool Children | 2 |
More ▼ |
Source
Educational and Psychological… | 12 |
Author
Ayers, Jerry B. | 1 |
Carlson, Jerry S. | 1 |
Chew, Alex L. | 1 |
Cicchetti, Domenic V. | 1 |
Curtis, Connie June | 1 |
Favero, Jane | 1 |
Feldt, Leonard S. | 1 |
He, Wei | 1 |
Johnson, Charles E. | 1 |
Kim, Seonghoon | 1 |
Morris, John D. | 1 |
More ▼ |
Publication Type
Journal Articles | 8 |
Reports - Research | 7 |
Reports - Evaluative | 1 |
Education Level
Early Childhood Education | 1 |
Preschool Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
He, Wei; Wolfe, Edward W. – Educational and Psychological Measurement, 2012
In administration of individually administered intelligence tests, items are commonly presented in a sequence of increasing difficulty, and test administration is terminated after a predetermined number of incorrect answers. This practice produces stochastically censored data, a form of nonignorable missing data. By manipulating four factors…
Descriptors: Individual Testing, Intelligence Tests, Test Items, Test Length
Sheng, Yanyan; Wikle, Christopher K. – Educational and Psychological Measurement, 2008
As item response models gain increased popularity in large-scale educational and measurement testing situations, many studies have been conducted on the development and applications of unidimensional and multidimensional models. Recently, attention has been paid to IRT-based models with an overall ability dimension underlying several ability…
Descriptors: Test Items, Individual Testing, Item Response Theory, Evaluation Methods

Cicchetti, Domenic V. – Educational and Psychological Measurement, 1976
A computer program which computes both the interjudge reliability of individual measurements and the extent to which the judges are biased in their ratings vis-a-vis each other is presented. The methods proposed are recommended on the basis of recent developments in statistical research. (Author/JKS)
Descriptors: Computer Programs, Individual Testing, Test Bias, Test Reliability

Favero, Jane; And Others – Educational and Psychological Measurement, 1975
Scores, hypothesized abilities and Scales on the Lorge-Thorndike Intelligence Tests (LT), Multi-Level Edition, were intercorrelated and factor analyzed to determine overlap of structure-of-intellect (SOI) ability measure, their degree of relationship with LT scales, and the possible presence of second order factors. (Author/BJG)
Descriptors: Cognitive Processes, Elementary Education, Individual Testing, Intelligence

Chew, Alex L.; Morris, John D. – Educational and Psychological Measurement, 1984
The validity of the Lollipop Test: A Diagnostic Screening Test of School Readiness was examined using the Metropolitan Readiness Test (MRT), Level I, Form Q, as the criterion. Appreciable concurrent validity was found across test batteries. Implications for school readiness screening are discussed. (Author/BS)
Descriptors: Correlation, Individual Testing, Kindergarten Children, Multivariate Analysis

Ayers, Jerry B.; Johnson, Charles E. – Educational and Psychological Measurement, 1970
Descriptors: Early Childhood Education, Individual Testing, Kindergarten, Predictive Validity

Swanson, Beverly B.; And Others – Educational and Psychological Measurement, 1981
Samples of entering first-grade students were used to examine the predictive validity of the group administered Metropolitan Readiness Test (MRT) and the individually administered Meeting Street School Screening Test (MSSST). The advantage of the latter was found to possibly outweigh the advantage of efficiency in group administration. (Author/GK)
Descriptors: Grade 1, Group Testing, Individual Testing, Predictive Validity

Wiedl, Karl Heinz; Carlson, Jerry S. – Educational and Psychological Measurement, 1976
Factor analysis of an administration of the Raven Progressive Matrices Test to children in grades 1, 2, and 3 revealed three orthogonal factors interpreted as (1) concrete and abstract reasoning, (2) continuous and discrete pattern completion, and (3) pattern completion through disclosure. Results are discussed in several contexts. (RC)
Descriptors: Age, Elementary School Students, Factor Analysis, Factor Structure

Willson, Victor L.; Reynold, Cecil R. – Educational and Psychological Measurement, 1985
Techniques for constructing short forms of tests are discussed, and an example is given using the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale-Revised. Reliability and validity estimation equations are presented. (GDC)
Descriptors: Adults, Individual Testing, Intelligence Tests, Norm Referenced Tests

Valencia, Richard R.; Rothwell, Judith G. – Educational and Psychological Measurement, 1984
The concurrent validity of the Wechsler Preschool and Primary Scale of Intelligence (WPPSI) was assessed against the McCarthy Scales of Children's Abilities in a sample of 39 Mexican-American preschool children from low socioeconomic status background. Results indicated some specific support for the WPPSI's concurrent validity. (Author/BS)
Descriptors: Culture Fair Tests, Individual Testing, Intelligence Tests, Mexican Americans
Feldt, Leonard S.; Kim, Seonghoon – Educational and Psychological Measurement, 2006
Researchers sometimes need a statistical test of the hypothesis that two values of Cronbach's alpha reliability coefficient are equal. The situation may involve scores from two different measures administered to independent random samples or from the same measure administered to random samples from two different populations. Feldt derived a test…
Descriptors: Individual Testing, Test Items, Sample Size, Scores

Curtis, Connie June; And Others – Educational and Psychological Measurement, 1979
The score distributions of the two methods of administration described in the title revealed comparable means, standard deviations, and general shape of distribution. With respect to validity coefficients, no appreciable differences were found. (JKS)
Descriptors: Comparative Testing, Educational Testing, Eye Hand Coordination, Grade 2