NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Publication Date
In 20250
Since 20240
Since 2021 (last 5 years)0
Since 2016 (last 10 years)0
Since 2006 (last 20 years)1
Audience
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Showing 1 to 15 of 50 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
He, Wei; Wolfe, Edward W. – Educational and Psychological Measurement, 2012
In administration of individually administered intelligence tests, items are commonly presented in a sequence of increasing difficulty, and test administration is terminated after a predetermined number of incorrect answers. This practice produces stochastically censored data, a form of nonignorable missing data. By manipulating four factors…
Descriptors: Individual Testing, Intelligence Tests, Test Items, Test Length
Eme, Robert F.; Walker, Ronald E. – J Clin Psychol, 1969
Descriptors: Group Testing, Individual Testing, Intelligence Quotient, Intelligence Tests
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Favero, Jane; And Others – Educational and Psychological Measurement, 1975
Scores, hypothesized abilities and Scales on the Lorge-Thorndike Intelligence Tests (LT), Multi-Level Edition, were intercorrelated and factor analyzed to determine overlap of structure-of-intellect (SOI) ability measure, their degree of relationship with LT scales, and the possible presence of second order factors. (Author/BJG)
Descriptors: Cognitive Processes, Elementary Education, Individual Testing, Intelligence
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Armstrong, Robert J.; And Others – Child Study Journal, 1971
Descriptors: Individual Testing, Intelligence Tests, Placement, Special Classes
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Holroyd, R. G.; Bickley, James – Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 1976
The 1960 and 1972 revisions of the Stanford Binet, form LM are compared. The normative tables are examined in detail and the adequacy and usefulness of the 1972 revision is evaluated. The author concludes that the 1972 restandardization procedures reveal notable deficiencies which cause it to compare unfavorably with the McCarthy Scales and the…
Descriptors: Children, Comparative Analysis, Individual Testing, Intelligence Tests
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Jacobs, Jon C. – Psychology in the Schools, 1971
Administration of the BG in a group situation provided as much, and as reliable, information as did individual administration. Besides the economy, it provided an opportunity to observe the individual child's functioning as a member of a peer group, both in relation to it and in conjunction with it. (Author)
Descriptors: Diagnostic Tests, Group Testing, Individual Testing, Intelligence Tests
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Elwood, David L.; Griffin, H. Richard – Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 1972
A system was designed and constructed capable of totally automating the administration of several psychological tests and treatment procedures. It is described here. (Author)
Descriptors: Automation, Individual Testing, Intelligence Tests, Psychological Testing
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Lessler, Ken; Galinsky, M. David – Psychology in the Schools, 1971
Descriptors: Evaluation, Individual Testing, Intelligence Tests, Intervention
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Solkoff, Norman – Perceptual and Motor Skills, 1974
Concludes that where significant interaction between the child and the examiner took place, black children achieved their highest scores on the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children with a white examiner. (RB)
Descriptors: Black Students, Educational Research, Elementary Education, Individual Testing
Miklich, Donald R. – Measurement and Evaluation in Guidance, 1971
This article describes a device used to array the pieces of the Object Assembly Test, a subscale of the Wechsler Intelligence Scales for Children, in exact standardized order in less time than is now needed and without a screen, thus guaranteeing that the subject will have no previous experience with the pieces. (Author/BY)
Descriptors: Children, Individual Testing, Intelligence Tests, Measurement Techniques
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Boehm, Ann E.; And Others – Journal of School Psychology, 1974
This study demonstrates, in the area of individual intelligence test administration, how competency standards can be implemented in school psychology training. The paper sets up behavioral objectives, determines what training is required for specified levels of mastery, and shows what specific training procedures contribute to the achievement of…
Descriptors: Behavioral Objectives, Competency Based Teacher Education, Educational Programs, Individual Testing
CONTRUCCI, VICTOR J.; AND OTHERS – 1962
FOUR COMMONLY USED INDIVIDUAL INTELLIGENCE TESTS ARE DESCRIBED. DESCRIPTIONS OF SUBTESTS ARE GIVEN, ALONG WITH EXPLANATION OF WHAT EACH TEST MEASURES. THIS INFORMATION IS PROVIDED TO ASSIST THE TEACHER IN IDENTIFYING SPECIFIC ABILITIES AND WEAKNESSES IN INDIVIDUAL CHILDREN. (JW)
Descriptors: Individual Testing, Intelligence Quotient, Intelligence Tests, Measurement Instruments
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Wright, Dan; Piersel, Wayne C. – Journal of School Psychology, 1987
Examines relationships between two measures of general ability (Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children-Revised and Educational Ability Series) and three measures of academic achievement (teacher grades, Wide Range Achievement Test, and Science Research Associates Achievement Series) in 160 elementary school children. Indicated comparability of…
Descriptors: Academic Ability, Academic Achievement, Decision Making, Elementary Education
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Ysseldyke, James; And Others – Psychology in the Schools, 1981
Compares the performance of learning disabled students on the WISC-R and the Tests of Cognitive Abilities from the Woodcock-Johnson Psycho-Educational Battery. This study finds that learning disabled subjects performed more poorly on the Tests of Cognitive Abilities than on the WISC-R. (Author)
Descriptors: Cognitive Measurement, Comparative Analysis, Correlation, Elementary Education
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Butler, John – National Elementary Principal, 1975
Predicts that by the year 2000, IQ tests will have disappeared, being replaced by evaluations of a broad range of talents and abilities that avoid unfair and damaging labels. (DW)
Descriptors: Cultural Influences, Culture Fair Tests, Elementary Secondary Education, Individual Testing
Previous Page | Next Page ยป
Pages: 1  |  2  |  3  |  4