NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing all 11 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Sullivan, Jessica; Davidson, Kathryn; Wade, Shirlene; Barner, David – Journal of Child Language, 2019
During acquisition, children must learn both the meanings of words and how to interpret them in context. For example, children must learn the logical semantics of the scalar quantifier "some" and its pragmatically enriched meaning: 'some but not all'. Some studies have shown that 'scalar implicature' -- that "some" implies…
Descriptors: Semantics, Inferences, Language Acquisition, Children
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Sullivan, Jessica; Barner, David – Developmental Science, 2016
When children acquire language, they often learn words in the absence of direct instruction (e.g. "This is a ball!") or even social cues to reference (e.g. eye gaze, pointing). However, there are few accounts of how children do this, especially in cases where the referent of a new word is ambiguous. Across two experiments, we test…
Descriptors: Preschool Children, Language Acquisition, Inferences, Language Usage
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Barner, David – Journal of Child Language, 2017
Perceptual representations of objects and approximate magnitudes are often invoked as building blocks that children combine to acquire the positive integers. Systems of numerical perception are either assumed to contain the logical foundations of arithmetic innately, or to supply the basis for their induction. I propose an alternative to this…
Descriptors: Numbers, Perception, Children, Learning
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Sullivan, Jessica; Boucher, Juliana; Kiefer, Reina J.; Williams, Katherine; Barner, David – Cognitive Science, 2019
Word learning depends critically on the use of linguistic context to constrain the likely meanings of words. However, the mechanisms by which children infer word meaning from linguistic context are still poorly understood. In this study, we asked whether adults (n = 58) and 2- to 6-year-old children (n = 180) use discourse coherence relations…
Descriptors: Cues, Linguistic Theory, Discourse Analysis, Toddlers
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Sullivan, Jessica; Barner, David – Child Development, 2014
How do children map number words to the numerical magnitudes they represent? Recent work in adults has shown that two distinct mechanisms--structure mapping and associative mapping--connect number words to nonlinguistic numerical representations (Sullivan, J., 2012). This study investigated the development of number word mappings, and the roles of…
Descriptors: Inferences, Association (Psychology), Children, Numbers
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Hochstein, Lara; Bale, Alan; Barner, David – Language Learning and Development, 2018
We investigated "scalar implicature" in adolescents and children with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) to test whether theory of mind deficits associated with autism affect pragmatic inferences in language. We tested scalar implicature computation in adolescents with ASD (12-18 years) and asked whether they reason about mental states when…
Descriptors: Autism, Pervasive Developmental Disorders, Adolescents, Language Usage
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Brooks, Neon; Audet, Jennifer; Barner, David – Developmental Psychology, 2013
Before children learn the specific meanings of numerals like six, do they know that they represent precise quantities? Previous studies have reported conflicting evidence and have found that children expect numerals to label precise quantities in some tasks but not in others (Condry & Spelke, 2008; Sarnecka & Gelman, 2004). In this…
Descriptors: Pragmatics, Inferences, Preschool Children, Numbers
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Srinivasan, Mahesh; Chestnut, Eleanor; Li, Peggy; Barner, David – Cognitive Psychology, 2013
It is typically assumed that count nouns like "fork" act as logical sortals, specifying whether objects are countable units of a kind (e.g., that a whole fork counts as "one fork") or not (e.g., that a piece of a fork does not count as "one fork"). In four experiments, we provide evidence from linguistic and conceptual development that nouns do…
Descriptors: Linguistics, Novelty (Stimulus Dimension), Nouns, Inferences
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Barner, David – Language Learning and Development, 2012
How do children learn the meanings of number words like "one," "two," and "three"? Whereas many words that children learn in early acquisition denote individual things and their properties (e.g., cats, colors, shapes), numerals, like quantifiers, denote the properties of sets. Unlike quantifiers such as "several" and "many," numerals denote…
Descriptors: Preschool Children, Number Concepts, Nouns, Inferences
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Barner, David; Bachrach, Asaf – Cognitive Psychology, 2010
How do children as young as 2 years of age know that numerals, like "one," have exact interpretations, while quantifiers and words like "a" do not? Previous studies have argued that only numerals have exact lexical meanings. Children could not use scalar implicature to strengthen numeral meanings, it is argued, since they fail to do so for…
Descriptors: Young Children, Toddlers, Inferences, Language Acquisition
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Barner, David; Brooks, Neon; Bale, Alan – Cognition, 2011
When faced with a sentence like, "Some of the toys are on the table", adults, but not preschoolers, compute a scalar implicature, taking the sentence to imply that not all the toys are on the table. This paper explores the hypothesis that children fail to compute scalar implicatures because they lack knowledge of relevant scalar alternatives to…
Descriptors: Context Effect, Sentences, Role, Inferences