NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing all 4 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Michelle M. Haby; Jorge Otávio Maia Barreto; Jenny Yeon Hee Kim; Sasha Peiris; Cristián Mansilla; Marcela Torres; Diego Emmanuel Guerrero-Magaña; Ludovic Reveiz – Research Synthesis Methods, 2024
Rapid review methodology aims to facilitate faster conduct of systematic reviews to meet the needs of the decision-maker, while also maintaining quality and credibility. This systematic review aimed to determine the impact of different methodological shortcuts for undertaking rapid reviews on the risk of bias (RoB) of the results of the review.…
Descriptors: Decision Making, Medical Research, Research Reports, Search Strategies
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Sutton, Anthea; Galvan De La Cruz, Maria Carmen; Leaviss, Joanna; Booth, Andrew – Research Synthesis Methods, 2018
Introduction: Registration and publication of trial protocols has become increasingly important and a requirement in some sources of funding and publication. Increased access to protocols yields many potential benefits, but there are issues regarding identification of published protocols. The aim of this investigation is to compare methods of…
Descriptors: Comparative Analysis, Medical Research, Research Methodology, Outcomes of Treatment
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Golder, Su; Wright, Kath; Loke, Yoon K. – Research Synthesis Methods, 2017
Authors and indexers are increasingly including terms for adverse "drug" effects in the titles, abstracts, or indexing of records in MEDLINE and Embase. However, it is not clear if this is the same for studies with "nondrug" adverse effects data. We therefore assessed the feasibility of using adverse effects terms when…
Descriptors: Intervention, Outcomes of Treatment, Databases, Medical Research
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Marshall, Iain J.; Noel-Storr, Anna; Kuiper, Joël; Thomas, James; Wallace, Byron C. – Research Synthesis Methods, 2018
Machine learning (ML) algorithms have proven highly accurate for identifying Randomized Controlled Trials (RCTs) but are not used much in practice, in part because the best way to make use of the technology in a typical workflow is unclear. In this work, we evaluate ML models for RCT classification (support vector machines, convolutional neural…
Descriptors: Randomized Controlled Trials, Accuracy, Computer Software, Classification