Descriptor
| Evaluation Criteria | 1 |
| Evaluation Methods | 1 |
| Information Retrieval | 1 |
| Information Seeking | 1 |
| Information Sources | 1 |
| Information Technology | 1 |
| Relevance (Information… | 1 |
| Research | 1 |
| Selection Tools | 1 |
| User Needs (Information) | 1 |
Source
| Journal of the American… | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 1 |
| Reports - Research | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewedKekalalainen, Jaana; Jarvelin, Kalervo – Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 2002
Proposes evaluation methods based on the use of nondichotomous relevance judgements in information retrieval (IR) experiments. Argues that evaluation methods should credit IR methods for their ability to retrieve highly relevant documents. This is desirable from the user point of view in modern large IR environments. (Author/AEF)
Descriptors: Evaluation Criteria, Evaluation Methods, Information Retrieval, Information Seeking
