NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing all 7 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Harald Wieser – Research Evaluation, 2025
The transformative turn in research and innovation (R&I) policy calls for new approaches to monitoring and evaluation, yet most evaluands are still rooted in previous policy paradigms. For evaluators tasked with conducting ex-post evaluations, this situation creates multiple challenges that have received little attention to date. In this…
Descriptors: Innovation, Research, Research and Development, Evaluation
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Thomas Zacharewicz; Victor García-Flores; Ignacio González-Vázquez; Luis-Antonio Palma-Martos – Research Evaluation, 2024
The monitoring and evaluation of R&I policies relies on quantitative and qualitative methods with important methodological shortcomings. Quantitative assessments rely on standardized indicators that do not capture context-specific challenges, while qualitative approaches lack comparability. Both approaches are complementary but not always…
Descriptors: Policy Analysis, Foreign Countries, Policy, Research and Development
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Sheets, Robert G.; Crawford, Stephen – EDUCAUSE Review, 2012
Higher education is under enormous pressure to improve outcomes and reduce costs. Information technology can help achieve these goals, but only if it is properly harnessed. This article argues that one key to harnessing information technology is business model innovation that results in more "open" and "unbundled" operations in learning and…
Descriptors: Higher Education, Research and Development, Information Technology, Models
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Gray, Denis O.; Sundstrom, Eric – Industry and Higher Education, 2010
Two emergent conceptual models for fostering the development of innovative technology through applied science at Cooperative Research Centers (CRCs)--the Triple Helix and the science of team science--have proved highly productive in stimulating research into how the innovation process works. Although the two arenas for fostering innovation have…
Descriptors: Innovation, Research and Development Centers, Technology, Scientists
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Lynskey, Michael J. – Industry and Higher Education, 2010
Knowledge spillovers from universities and other public research institutions (PRIs) are viewed as essential for innovation. Previous studies examining the impact of such spillovers have been confined to the West, and there are no comparable studies using empirical data from Japan that explore the relationship between spillovers from PRIs and…
Descriptors: Intellectual Property, Innovation, Foreign Countries, Higher Education
Harkins, Judith E. – Gallaudet Today, 1987
The role of Gallaudet University as innovator, evaluator, monitor, and information source in the development and promotion of technology appropriate for the deaf is detailed. This article describes Gallaudet's involvement in projects focusing on computer networks in classrooms, captioning television broadcasts, product evaluations, research and…
Descriptors: Appropriate Technology, College Programs, Computer Uses in Education, Deafness
HAMMOND, ROBERT L. – 1967
A SYSTEMATIC APPROACH TO THE EVALUATION OF INNOVATIONS HAS BECOME ONE OF THE NATION'S MOST PRESSING PROBLEMS. RECOGNIZING THIS NEED, A TEAM OF EDUCATORS DEVELOPED AN APPROACH TO THE PROBLEM OF EVALUATION THROUGH THE UTILIZATION OF A MODEL. THE FIRST STEP IN THIS EVALUATION PROCESS IS TO BEGIN WITH A SINGLE SUBJECT AREA OF THE CURRICULUM. SECONDLY,…
Descriptors: Behavioral Objectives, Evaluation, Innovation, Inservice Education