NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing 1 to 15 of 23 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Martin, Dan M. – Educational Record, 1981
Consortia have much to offer higher education but are often unappealing because of undue emphasis on reducing costs, inadequate attention to the range of possibilities, and mismatching of membership and mission. Four types of consortia exist according to purposes (special and general) and membership (heterogeneous or homogeneous). (MSE)
Descriptors: College Role, Consortia, Efficiency, Higher Education
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
George, Melvin D.; Braskamp, Larry A. – Educational Record, 1978
The effects on universities of different kinds of accountability mechanisms are examined, and ways are suggested in which higher education institutions can discharge their obligations to society while preserving their intellectual and fiscal integrity. (Author/LBH)
Descriptors: Academic Freedom, Accountability, College Role, Educational Finance
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Richards, Michael D. – Educational Record, 1978
Independent colleges and universities are becoming more inclined toward a highly centralized source of support--the federal government--subjecting themselves to an influential leveling medium. Federal support then begins the process of molding institutions into a collective or tribal state and the private identity gives way to sameness. (LBH)
Descriptors: College Role, Essays, Federal Aid, Federal Government
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Berdahl, Robert – Educational Record, 1990
In any public university system, the relationship between the state's demands for utility and accountability and the universities' needs for academic freedom and autonomy create serious tensions. Coordinating boards have not reached the positive potential that was foreseen in the author's book "Statewide Coordination of Higher Education." (MLW)
Descriptors: Academic Freedom, Accountability, Conflict, Government School Relationship
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
El-Khawas, Elaine H. – Educational Record, 1978
Self-regulation has been suggested as an alternative to government regulation and its attendant problems. An outline is offered of what self-regulation by institutions could mean, what forms it might take, and the kind of cooperation and commitment that will be necessary for such a project to work. (Author/LBH)
Descriptors: Academic Freedom, Federal Government, Federal Regulation, Government School Relationship
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Walker, Donald E. – Educational Record, 1978
The status of American higher education is examined in this essay, with focus on such issues as institutional autonomy, the role of advanced education in society, access, and accountability. (LBH)
Descriptors: Access to Education, Accountability, College Role, Cultural Context
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Saunders, Charles B., Jr. – Educational Record, 1978
Ways are suggested for institutions of higher education to articulate standards before the federal government determines them. A self-regulating mechanism is proposed that requires no massive effort, just a commitment to establish standards wherever they are needed. (Author/LBH)
Descriptors: College Administration, College Role, Federal Regulation, Governance
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Giamatti, A. Bartlett – Educational Record, 1980
The regulatory process of the federal government may be its own worst enemy by threatening the substance and character of private higher education. In addition, it is the responsibility of the corporate sector in the United States to support the nonprofit sector if it is to live up to its spoken convictions. (MSE)
Descriptors: Business, Federal Regulation, Government School Relationship, Higher Education
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Saxon, David S. – Educational Record, 1981
A primary challenge for academic administrators is to survive the 1980s with a strong, diverse system of higher education that has a healthy and mutually rewarding partnership with the federal government. Institutions must have the courage and integrity to decide when to accept and when to refuse federal aid and regulation. (MSE)
Descriptors: Academic Freedom, Federal Aid, Federal Regulation, Futures (of Society)
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Heyns, Roger W. – Educational Record, 1977
A reduction of the total number and scope of government regulations can be accomplished only through a basic commitment by institutions to the development of credible self-regulating mechanisms. These should have the authority to monitor institutional policy and practices. (Author/LBH)
Descriptors: Accreditation (Institutions), Administrative Policy, Federal Regulation, Government Role
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Millett, John D. – Educational Record, 1977
Institutional autonomy is discussed in terms of: (1) what functions society expects higher education to perform: (2) the effect of institutional dependence on public financing; and (3) the social importance of higher education. (LBH)
Descriptors: College Role, Financial Support, Government School Relationship, Higher Education
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Grant, Christine H. B. – Educational Record, 1979
It is suggested that institutional control of intercollegiate athletics has been eroded, partially due to athletic governance structures, federal controls, the transformation of recreational activities to big business, and television. Recommendations for reestablishing institutional authority over intercollegiate athletics are offered. (JMD)
Descriptors: Administrative Organization, Athletics, College Administration, Extramural Athletics
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Hartle, Terry W. – Educational Record, 1994
In response to real and perceived problems in higher education, the federal government has increased regulation on campus. Even greater changes, some that will affect the teaching function of colleges and universities, notably the state review and accreditation provisions of the Higher Education Amendments of 1992, are already in the works. (MSE)
Descriptors: Accreditation (Institutions), Federal Legislation, Federal Regulation, Futures (of Society)
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Thompson, Dennis F. – Educational Record, 1989
John Stuart Mill's principle of liberty is discussed with the view that it needs to be revised to guide moral judgments in higher education. Three key elements need to be modified: the action that is constrained; the constraint on the action; and the agent whose action is constrained. (MLW)
Descriptors: Academic Freedom, Civil Liberties, Ethics, General Education
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Zimic, Lesley Francis – Educational Record, 1978
The AAUP 1976 Recommended Insitutuinal Regulations prescribes that "dismissal will not be used to restrain faculty members in their exercise of academic freedom or other rights of American citizens." Constitutional freedoms, professional accountability, AAUP case reports, the Angela Davis case, and court decisions are discussed. (LBH)
Descriptors: Academic Freedom, College Faculty, Constitutional Law, Court Litigation
Previous Page | Next Page ยป
Pages: 1  |  2