Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 1 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 2 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 6 |
Descriptor
| Cheating | 6 |
| Grading | 6 |
| Integrity | 6 |
| Ethics | 4 |
| Plagiarism | 3 |
| College Students | 2 |
| Educational Policy | 2 |
| Essays | 2 |
| Feedback (Response) | 2 |
| Foreign Countries | 2 |
| Higher Education | 2 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
| Academic Senate for… | 1 |
| British Educational Research… | 1 |
| Gifted Child Today | 1 |
| Journal of Educational… | 1 |
| Principal Leadership | 1 |
| Teaching in Higher Education | 1 |
Author
| Erickson, Jeffrey A. | 1 |
| Geddes, Kimberly A. | 1 |
| Gillooly, Leah | 1 |
| Lines, Lisa | 1 |
| Medway, Dominic | 1 |
| Nejdet Karadag | 1 |
| Roper, Stuart | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 5 |
| Reports - Research | 4 |
| Information Analyses | 1 |
| Reports - Descriptive | 1 |
| Reports - Evaluative | 1 |
| Tests/Questionnaires | 1 |
Education Level
| Higher Education | 4 |
| Postsecondary Education | 3 |
| Elementary Secondary Education | 1 |
| High Schools | 1 |
| Two Year Colleges | 1 |
Audience
| Administrators | 1 |
| Policymakers | 1 |
Location
| Australia | 1 |
| California | 1 |
| United Kingdom | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
| California Education Code | 1 |
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Nejdet Karadag – Journal of Educational Technology and Online Learning, 2023
The purpose of this study is to examine the impact of artificial intelligence (AI) on online assessment in the context of opportunities and threats based on the literature. To this end, 19 articles related to the AI tool ChatGPT and online assessment were analysed through rapid literature review. In the content analysis, the themes of "AI's…
Descriptors: Artificial Intelligence, Computer Assisted Testing, Natural Language Processing, Grading
Medway, Dominic; Roper, Stuart; Gillooly, Leah – British Educational Research Journal, 2018
Contract cheating is currently a concern for universities and the higher education (HE) sector. It has been brought into the spotlight in recent years through the growth of online essay mills, where students can easily commission and purchase written assessment responses. This study contributes to the wider literature on academic integrity in HE…
Descriptors: Cheating, Contracts, College Students, Higher Education
Lines, Lisa – Teaching in Higher Education, 2016
Ghostwriting is difficult to detect, it has the potential to be high quality, and universities do not currently have adequate policies in place to police it. Determining the quality of the ghostwriting services available to tertiary students is of vital importance because underestimating the potential for students to use these services to pass…
Descriptors: Foreign Countries, Educational Quality, Online Vendors, Cheating
Erickson, Jeffrey A. – Principal Leadership, 2011
At a very early age, students learn the point system and how school can be about the accumulation of points, not the accumulation of knowledge and skills. Grading systems are pervasive in districts across the nation, with questionable results. For example, a southern school district was highlighted in a 2009 Associated Press story for selling test…
Descriptors: Feedback (Response), Grading, Teaching Methods, Educational Change
Geddes, Kimberly A. – Gifted Child Today, 2011
Gifted high school students are essentially absent in the research concerning academic integrity; however, over the past few years, educators of gifted students have noticed an increase in the occurrences of academic dishonesty among students in gifted classrooms (Abilock, 2009). This research may be analyzed to provide some insight into the…
Descriptors: Homework, Academically Gifted, Grade Point Average, Cheating
Academic Senate for California Community Colleges, 2007
This Academic Senate paper is in response to two resolutions from Fall 2005 concerning academic dishonesty. One resolution, 14.02, "Student Cheating," sought clarification on a System Office legal position that limits the ability of local faculty to fail a student for a single incident of academic dishonesty, and pending the result of…
Descriptors: Civil Rights, Discipline, Cheating, Distance Education

Peer reviewed
Direct link
