NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Individuals with Disabilities…1
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Showing 1 to 15 of 45 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Autumn K. Wilke – Educational Forum, 2024
Expectations of smartness are woven into the foundation of postsecondary education (e.g. admissions, grading). This content analysis examines current postsecondary dis/ability literature through the theoretical frame of DisCrit to identify how concepts of smartness are treated within the field. The findings call for greater interrogation of the…
Descriptors: Journal Articles, Postsecondary Education, Learning Disabilities, Attitudes toward Disabilities
Restori, Alberto F.; Gresham, Frank M.; Cook, Clayton R. – California School Psychologist, 2008
When Congress passed the Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act in 2004 (IDEIA 2004), local educational agencies (LEA) were permitted to use a Response-to-Intervention (RtI) approach for identifying children with possible learning disabilities for special education. Furthermore, IDEIA 2004 no longer required LEAs to establish an…
Descriptors: Intervention, Federal Legislation, Learning Disabilities, Intelligence Tests
Gottlieb, Jay; And Others – Analysis and Intervention in Developmental Disabilities, 1983
Nine low IQ (less than 80) and 12 high IQ (100 plus) learning disabled children (grades four through six) who attended resource room programs were observed in regular classes. Results indicated that teachers did not perceive the two groups of LD children differently but that the teachers behaved differently toward the two groups. (Author/MC)
Descriptors: Intelligence Differences, Intermediate Grades, Learning Disabilities, Mainstreaming
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Snart, Fern; And Others – Journal of Special Education, 1988
The study of cognitive processing in high IQ and average IQ elementary grade learning disabled and non-learning disabled children found that LD students were poorer in sequential processing and planning compared to NLD students; high IQ LD students lost their IQ advantage to low IQ LDs in sequential scores. (Author/DB)
Descriptors: Cognitive Processes, Elementary Education, Intelligence Differences, Intelligence Quotient
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Dean, Raymond S. – Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 1978
Determined if Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children-Revised subtest patterns would differentiate the performance of emotionally disturbed and learning-disabled children. Subtests differentiated significantly between diagnostic categories. Learning-disabled children performed predictively poorer on block design, picture arrangement, and object…
Descriptors: Children, Cognitive Processes, Emotional Problems, Intelligence Differences
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Gutkin, Terry B. – Psychology in the Schools, 1979
Investigated the measurement properties and practical utility of Bannatyne's recategorized WISC-R scores. Analyses of the scores of Caucasian learning disabled children indicated that, as a group, these students were characterized by the predicted Spatial-Conceptual-Sequential pattern. This was not found to be true for Mexican-American learning…
Descriptors: Children, Elementary Education, Intelligence Differences, Intelligence Tests
Grobecker, Betsey – 1998
In this study, children (ages 7-12) of average intelligence who had learning disabilities (LD) (n=29) and typical children (n=30) were individually tested in a task that investigated the development of proportional structures of thought. In addition, mathematical knowledge was assessed on the Woodcock-Johnson Tests of Achievement-Revised (WJTA-R).…
Descriptors: Cognitive Ability, Computation, Elementary Education, Intelligence Differences
McMenemy, Richard A. – Acad Therap Quart, 1969
Descriptors: Dyslexia, Exceptional Child Education, Individual Characteristics, Intelligence Differences
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Bortner, Morton; And Others – Journal of Special Education, 1972
Descriptors: Children, Exceptional Child Research, Hyperactivity, Intelligence Differences
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Bloom, Allan S.; Raskin, Larry M. – Journal of Clinical Psychology, 1980
Compared the WISC-R Verbal-Performance IQ discrepancies of learning-disabled children and of the normative sample. It was concluded that without clinical evidence to suggest otherwise, it cannot be assumed automatically that a child's discrepancy score, unless of extreme magnitude, is related to the learning disability itself. (Author)
Descriptors: Comparative Analysis, Educational Diagnosis, Exceptional Persons, Intelligence Differences
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Shaywitz, Sally E.; Holahan, John M.; Freudenheim, Daniele A.; Fletcher, Jack M.; Makuch, Robert W.; Shaywitz, Bennett A. – Gifted Child Quarterly, 2001
A study involving boys (grades 4-7) who were highly gifted (n=18), low gifted (n=17), had learning disabilities (n=26), and were typical (n=26), found highly gifted boys exhibited levels of behavioral problems similar to those with learning disabilities, whereas low gifted boys had lower levels than boys with learning disabilities. (Contains…
Descriptors: Behavior Problems, Elementary Secondary Education, Gifted, Hyperactivity
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Telegdy, Gabriel A. – Psychology in The Schools, 1973
Subjects were 30 boys aged 9-12 with learning disabilities. Lower socioeconomic status (LSES) learning-disabled boys scored lower than the normal population on both verbal and performance scales of the WISC while upper-middle socioeconomic status (USES) boys scored lower only on verbal tests. USES boys scored higher than LSES boys in Performance…
Descriptors: Intelligence, Intelligence Differences, Intelligence Quotient, Intelligence Tests
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Naglieri, Jack A. – Contemporary Educational Psychology, 1982
Indices of scatter on the WISC-R and McCarthy Scales were examined for 20 educable mentally retarded and 20 learning disabled children in relation to 20 matched controls and to standardization samples. Exceptional children exhibited more subtest scatter and variability than the standardization sample but not more than the control group. (Author/RD)
Descriptors: Individual Differences, Intelligence Differences, Intelligence Tests, Learning Disabilities
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Morgan, Anna W.; Sullivan, Susan A.; Darden, Cindy; Gregg, Noel – Journal of Learning Disabilities, 1997
This study involving 30 college students with learning disabilities and 30 students without learning disabilities (ages 18-30) compared results obtained on the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale-Revised and the Kaufman Adolescent and Adult Intelligence Test. Results found no significant differences between the two groups or between tests.…
Descriptors: Cognitive Ability, Cognitive Measurement, College Students, Intelligence Differences
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Mastropieri, Margo A.; Scruggs, Thomas E.; Boon, Richard; Carter, Karen Butcher – Remedial and Special Education, 2001
A study involving 75 elementary students, 51 with high-incidence disabilities, investigated variables associated with learning in an inquiry-oriented approach to the study of density and buoyancy. Preconceptions, scientific predictions, and academic achievement measures were not predictive of task performance. However, grade level and IQ were…
Descriptors: Age Differences, Discovery Learning, Elementary Education, Inquiry
Previous Page | Next Page ยป
Pages: 1  |  2  |  3