NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Education Level
Audience
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Larry P v Riles1
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Showing 1 to 15 of 37 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
DeFilippis, Nick A.; Fulmer, Kathleen – Educational and Psychological Measurement, 1980
The scores of elementary school students on the Quick Test were compared with scores on the Full Scale Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children-Revised. The relationship between the two tests varied significantly with age and intelligence levels. (Author/CP)
Descriptors: Age Differences, Elementary Education, Intelligence Differences, Intelligence Tests
Curran, Lisa; And Others – 1996
A major criticism of standardized intelligence tests is their improper use in measuring the intellectual competence of culturally diverse children. Factors which complicate the issue are the definition of intelligence, content bias in intelligence tests, and the interpretation of test scores between white middle class children and children of…
Descriptors: American Indians, Children, Cultural Context, Culture Fair Tests
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Blaha, John; Wallbrown, Fred H. – Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 1982
Obtained a hierarchical factor solution on the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale-Revised (WAIS-R) subtest intercorrelations for the nine age groups included in the standardization sample. Findings support the validity of the WAIS-R as a measure of general intelligence and the validity of maintaining separate Verbal and Performance IQs. (Author)
Descriptors: Adults, Age Differences, Factor Structure, Intelligence Differences
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Simpson, Robert G. – Educational and Psychological Measurement, 1982
The usefulness of the Peabody Individual Achievement Test General Information subtest as a general screening instrument with non-retarded subjects is shown in a study of concurrent validity between the subtest and the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children-Revised. Correlations between the instruments in two intelligence groups are discussed.…
Descriptors: Achievement Tests, Adolescents, Correlation, Educational Diagnosis
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Hiltonsmith, Robert W.; And Others – Journal of Clinical Psychology, 1982
Investigated the utility of the Revised Beta as a screening device for low-functioning minority-group criminal offenders. Mean scores for this sample were correlated only mildly. This finding contradicts prior research and creates the need for caution in using the Beta as a screening device with this population. (Author)
Descriptors: Blacks, Criminals, Hispanic Americans, Intelligence Differences
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Nelson, W. M., III; And Others – Journal of Personality Assessment, 1978
This study used 126 young adult black and white male inmates to test the comparability of the Pauker and Statz and Mogul short forms with the standard Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale (WAIS). The Pauker form was superior with this population. Findings should not be generalized to other ages, races, or to women. (Author/CP)
Descriptors: Intelligence, Intelligence Differences, Intelligence Tests, Males
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Ziegler, Mark E.; Doehrman, Steven – Journal of Clinical Psychology, 1979
Analysis of correlations between Verbal and Full Scale IQ scores for 231 high-IQ psychiatric outpatients indicated that Verbal IQ appears partially valid as a WAIS short form for this higher IQ group. Results are interpreted in terms of Resnick and Entin's short form validity criteria. (Editor/SJL)
Descriptors: Classification, Correlation, Emotional Disturbances, Intelligence Differences
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Morgan, Anna W.; Sullivan, Susan A.; Darden, Cindy; Gregg, Noel – Journal of Learning Disabilities, 1997
This study involving 30 college students with learning disabilities and 30 students without learning disabilities (ages 18-30) compared results obtained on the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale-Revised and the Kaufman Adolescent and Adult Intelligence Test. Results found no significant differences between the two groups or between tests.…
Descriptors: Cognitive Ability, Cognitive Measurement, College Students, Intelligence Differences
Vasgird, Dan – Crisis, 1975
Reviews Richard Herrnstein's article and book concerning I.Q. and argues that the questions of the nature of intelligence and the respective influences of environment and heredity are important not just in the interpretation of statistical evidence but because these questions have implications in the lives of human beings. (Author/JM)
Descriptors: Environmental Influences, Heredity, Intelligence Differences, Intelligence Tests
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Kinnie, Ernest J.; Sternlof, Richard E. – Child Development, 1971
By nonintellective" are meant factors which are present in a test situation and which influence the test scores obtained but are not obviously related to the skills or knowledge ostensibly being measured by the test. (Authors)
Descriptors: Intelligence Differences, Intelligence Tests, Language Role, Performance Factors
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Quattrocchi, Mary; Sherrets, Steven – Psychology in the Schools, 1980
Although the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children-Revised (WISC-R) involves modifications and a complete restandardization, the literature suggests that it remains very similar in nature to its predecessor, the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children (WISC). Individuals perform on the WISC-R largely the same as they do on the WISC. (Author)
Descriptors: Children, Elementary Secondary Education, Intelligence Differences, Intelligence Tests
Rivers, L. Wendell; And Others – Journal of Afro-American Issues, 1975
An examination of the limitations of I.Q. testing, the dangers of misclassification, the moral issues of testing as well as some of the legal consequences of such mishaps. Several alternatives and recommendations are offered. (EH)
Descriptors: Black Stereotypes, Group Testing, Grouping (Instructional Purposes), Intelligence Differences
Hecht, James T. – 1973
The relationship of test wiseness to I.Q. and the usability of I.Q. scores are discussed. Test wiseness involves the examinee's ability to obtain a high score on a standardized achievement test as a result of utilizing test-taking experience. Usability of I.Q. scores refers to the value of I.Q. scores to educators in making educational decisions.…
Descriptors: Intelligence Differences, Intelligence Quotient, Intelligence Tests, Research Reports
Shearer, C. Branton – 1997
Since Howard Gardner proposed the theory of multiple intelligences as an alternative to the unitary concept of general intelligence, educators have been searching for an acceptable method of assessment. To help with this search, three studies that describe the development and validation of a self- (and parent-) report measure of children's…
Descriptors: Adolescents, Children, Cognitive Measurement, Construct Validity
Hunt, J. McVicker – Trans, 1969
Descriptors: Disadvantaged Youth, Environmental Influences, Heredity, Human Development
Previous Page | Next Page ยป
Pages: 1  |  2  |  3