NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing all 10 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Buchanan, Lyle J.; Lindgren, Henry Clay – Journal of Psychology, 1973
Descriptors: Creativity Research, Grade 4, Group Dynamics, Interaction Process Analysis
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Schroeer, Ruediger S.; Flapan, Dorothy – Journal of Psychology, 1971
Descriptors: Aggression, Behavior Patterns, Friendship, Interaction Process Analysis
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Stover, Lillian; And Others – Journal of Psychology, 1971
Descriptors: Child Development, Developmental Psychology, Empathy, Guidance
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Goldman, Morton; And Others – Journal of Psychology, 1972
Descriptors: Behavior Patterns, Behavioral Science Research, College Students, Group Dynamics
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Smith, Kay H. – Journal of Psychology, 1972
Descriptors: Behavior Patterns, Behavioral Science Research, College Students, Competitive Selection
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Wellens, A. Rodney; Goldberg, Myron L. – Journal of Psychology, 1978
Indicates that dyadic relationships are seen as less positive with increasing distances between members and with less direct physical orientation, though contributing factors show that such effects are not simply additive. Shows that sex differences distinguish the judgments that observers make about dyadic relationships. (RL)
Descriptors: Behavioral Science Research, Distance, Higher Education, Interaction Process Analysis
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Terry, Roger L.; Evans, Jane E. – Journal of Psychology, 1972
Descriptors: Behavioral Science Research, Bias, Discrimination Learning, Interaction Process Analysis
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Kahn, Michael H.; Rudestam, Kjell E. – Journal of Psychology, 1971
Descriptors: Attitudes, Behavior Patterns, Behavioral Science Research, Communication (Thought Transfer)
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Garrison, John; Pate, Larry – Journal of Psychology, 1977
Tests a scaling instrument that measures an individual's power in four communication situations. Shows that positive and negative personal power and reward power are three stable factors accounting for seven-tenths of the total variance. Supports the hypothesis that perceived interpersonal power varies across communication contexts. (RL)
Descriptors: Communication (Thought Transfer), Communication Research, Factor Analysis, Interaction
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Williams, Robert L.; And Others – Journal of Psychology, 1971
Descriptors: Attitude Change, Behavior Change, Behavior Patterns, Interaction Process Analysis