Publication Date
| In 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2024 | 0 |
| Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 0 |
| Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 2 |
Descriptor
Source
| Database | 1 |
| Information Technology and… | 1 |
| Institute of Museum and… | 1 |
| Journal of Educational… | 1 |
| Research Strategies | 1 |
Author
| Badics, Joseph | 1 |
| Brown, Christopher C. | 1 |
| Edwards, Kirstie | 1 |
| Greenfield, Rich | 1 |
| Jaworski, Susan | 1 |
| Manjarrez, Carlos A. | 1 |
| Schoembs, Kyle | 1 |
| Shirato, Linda | 1 |
| Spaepen, Arthur | 1 |
| Sullivan, Roberta | 1 |
| Van Mele, Isabel | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 4 |
| Reports - Evaluative | 3 |
| Reports - Descriptive | 2 |
| Reports - Research | 2 |
| Numerical/Quantitative Data | 1 |
| Speeches/Meeting Papers | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
| United States | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Download full textManjarrez, Carlos A.; Schoembs, Kyle – Institute of Museum and Library Services, 2011
Over the past decade, policy discussions about public access computing in libraries have focused on the role that these institutions play in bridging the digital divide. In these discussions, public access computing services are generally targeted at individuals who either cannot afford a computer and Internet access, or have never received formal…
Descriptors: Access to Information, Computers, Public Libraries, Internet
Direct linkJaworski, Susan; Sullivan, Roberta – Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 2011
Do library catalogs compete with Google or is it the other way around? We know which came first but which will finish in the end? Only trained library professionals were considered qualified to develop reliable catalog records. However, with the increased sophistication of search engines, we are beginning to realize that a collaborative effort may…
Descriptors: Access to Information, Comparative Analysis, Cataloging, Usability
Brown, Christopher C. – Database, 1994
Discusses online library catalogs that are accessible via the Internet and describes their use to create bibliographies using EndNote software. Three catalogs are described that need no further editing; two are described that need some editing; examples of records are given; and the systems are compared. (LRW)
Descriptors: Academic Libraries, Bibliographic Records, Bibliographies, Comparative Analysis
Peer reviewedShirato, Linda; Badics, Joseph – Research Strategies, 1997
Reports on a survey of 631 colleges that investigated changes in library instruction and compared the results with previous LOEX (Library Orientation/Instruction Exchange) studies (1979, 1987). Provides data on size and type of institution, administration of instruction, types and methods of instruction (required, print, nonprint, methods used,…
Descriptors: Comparative Analysis, Educational Administration, Educational Trends, Graphs
Peer reviewedEdwards, Kirstie; Van Mele, Isabel; Verheust, Mieke; Spaepen, Arthur – Information Technology and Libraries, 1997
Three user interfaces to LIBIS, a library catalog accessible through the Internet, were evaluated for use by people who are motor impaired to identify how interface design influences the motor actions necessary to operate the system. Problems and recommendations related to simplicity, consistency, instinctiveness, interaction/feedback, and…
Descriptors: Access to Information, Comparative Analysis, Computer Interfaces, Computer Software Evaluation
Greenfield, Rich – 1997
The author argues that traditional library cataloging (MARC) and the online public access catalog (OPAC) are in collision with the world of the Internet because items in electronic formats undergo MARC cataloging only on a very selective basis. Also the library profession initially isolated itself from World Wide Web development by predicting no…
Descriptors: Access to Information, Authority Control (Information), Automatic Indexing, Bibliographic Records
