Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 1 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 1 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 1 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 2 |
Descriptor
| Cheating | 3 |
| Internet | 3 |
| Predictor Variables | 3 |
| Deception | 2 |
| Foreign Countries | 2 |
| Moral Values | 2 |
| Personality Traits | 2 |
| Plagiarism | 2 |
| Undergraduate Students | 2 |
| Academic Achievement | 1 |
| Cognitive Ability | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Author
| Dawkins, Russell L. | 1 |
| Nathanson, Craig | 1 |
| Paulhus, Delroy L. | 1 |
| Sandra Asantewaa Mensah | 1 |
| Williams, Kevin M. | 1 |
| Yuchen Wang | 1 |
| Yuehua Wu | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 3 |
| Reports - Research | 2 |
| Reports - Evaluative | 1 |
Education Level
| Higher Education | 3 |
| Postsecondary Education | 1 |
Audience
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Yuehua Wu; Yuchen Wang; Sandra Asantewaa Mensah – Research in Higher Education, 2025
While the internet has revolutionized academic study and research, it has also facilitated academic misconduct, presenting new challenges in maintaining academic integrity worldwide. This study, primarily drawing on the social cognitive theory, surveyed undergraduates at three universities in China to examine the status and working mechanism of…
Descriptors: Undergraduate Students, Internet, Cheating, Moral Values
Williams, Kevin M.; Nathanson, Craig; Paulhus, Delroy L. – Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 2010
Despite much research, skepticism remains over the possibility of profiling scholastic cheaters. However, several relevant predictor variables and newer diagnostic tools have been overlooked. We remedy this deficit with a series of three studies. Study 1 was a large-scale survey of a broad range of personality predictors of self-reported cheating.…
Descriptors: Cheating, Academic Achievement, Predictor Variables, Personality Traits
Peer reviewedDawkins, Russell L. – College Student Journal, 2004
This exploratory study examines self-reported acts of academic dishonesty for a sample of 858 undergraduate, graduate, and professional students on a small college campus (8,350 students). The study raises awareness to the occurrences, and challenges of academic dishonesty at small-sized institutions, somewhat overlooked in empirical research.…
Descriptors: Small Colleges, Cheating, College Students, Student Characteristics

Direct link
