Descriptor
| Group Norms | 3 |
| Group Structure | 3 |
| Interpersonal Relationship | 3 |
| Affective Behavior | 2 |
| Group Behavior | 2 |
| Group Dynamics | 2 |
| Antisocial Behavior | 1 |
| Educational Experiments | 1 |
| Group Experience | 1 |
| Group Membership | 1 |
| Group Status | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
| Small Group Behavior | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 1 |
| Reference Materials -… | 1 |
| Reports - Research | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewedFarrell, Michael P. – Small Group Behavior, 1979
This study first investigates the effects of group structure on collective projections in groups, then examines how collective projections feed back and affect group structure. It examines the effects of having a deviant in a group on group projections and responses. (Author)
Descriptors: Affective Behavior, Antisocial Behavior, Group Norms, Group Structure
Cernius, Vytas – 1976
Just as one has a different sense of a mountain from each approach to it, so each group theory gives differing and somewhat overlapping aspects of group functioning. Each approach can help explain part of what is going on. Jung focuses on the perceptual and evaluative aspects of the individual and the resulting group consequences. Schutz focuses…
Descriptors: Affective Behavior, Group Behavior, Group Dynamics, Group Experience
THE EFFECTS OF FORMALLY BASED STATUS DIFFERENCES ON GROUP PRODUCTIVITY, EFFICIENCY, AND RISK TAKING.
Download full textBRIDGES, EDWIN M.; AND OTHERS
THE PRIMARY PURPOSE OF THIS EXPERIMENT WAS TO DETERMINE WHETHER HIERARCHICALLY DIFFERENTIATED GROUPS WERE AS PRODUCTIVE ON PROBLEM-SOLVING TASKS AS HIERARCHICALLY UNDIFFERENTIATED GROUPS. THE EXPERIMENT ALSO INVESTIGATED THE EFFECTS OF FORMALLY BASED STATUS DIFFERENCES ON GROUP EFFICIENCY AND RISK-TAKING. TWENTY GROUPS CONTAINING FOUR SUBJECTS…
Descriptors: Educational Experiments, Group Behavior, Group Dynamics, Group Norms
