Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 0 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 1 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 1 |
Descriptor
Decision Making | 3 |
Interrater Reliability | 3 |
Judges | 3 |
Evaluators | 2 |
Performance Based Assessment | 2 |
Competency Based Education | 1 |
Correlation | 1 |
Educational Assessment | 1 |
Epistemology | 1 |
Evaluation Methods | 1 |
Evaluative Thinking | 1 |
More ▼ |
Author
Delandshere, Ginette | 1 |
Driessen, Erik W. | 1 |
Govaerts, Marjan J. B. | 1 |
Jaarsma, Debbie A. D. C. | 1 |
Lunz, Mary E. | 1 |
Oudkerk Pool, Andrea | 1 |
Petrosky, Anthony R. | 1 |
Publication Type
Journal Articles | 3 |
Reports - Evaluative | 2 |
Opinion Papers | 1 |
Reports - Research | 1 |
Education Level
Higher Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
Netherlands | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
From Aggregation to Interpretation: How Assessors Judge Complex Data in a Competency-Based Portfolio
Oudkerk Pool, Andrea; Govaerts, Marjan J. B.; Jaarsma, Debbie A. D. C.; Driessen, Erik W. – Advances in Health Sciences Education, 2018
While portfolios are increasingly used to assess competence, the validity of such portfolio-based assessments has hitherto remained unconfirmed. The purpose of the present research is therefore to further our understanding of how assessors form judgments when interpreting the complex data included in a competency-based portfolio. Eighteen…
Descriptors: Undergraduate Students, Medical Students, Medical Education, Competency Based Education

Lunz, Mary E.; And Others – Educational and Psychological Measurement, 1994
In a study involving eight judges, analysis with the FACETS model provides evidence that judges grade differently, whether or not scores correlate well. This outcome suggests that adjustments for differences among judges should be made before student measures are estimated to produce reproducible decisions. (SLD)
Descriptors: Correlation, Decision Making, Evaluation Methods, Evaluators

Delandshere, Ginette; Petrosky, Anthony R. – Educational Researcher, 1994
Discusses the role and consistency of judges' interpretations of teacher performance as part of an evaluative scheme for complex performance, with reference to the ideological framework of professional standards. The tension between assessment decisions and the recognition that assessment involves interpretation is explored. (SLD)
Descriptors: Decision Making, Educational Assessment, Epistemology, Evaluators