Publication Date
| In 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2024 | 0 |
| Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 0 |
| Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 1 |
Descriptor
| Comparative Analysis | 1 |
| Evidence | 1 |
| Faculty Development | 1 |
| Generalization | 1 |
| Grade 6 | 1 |
| Grade 8 | 1 |
| Grade 9 | 1 |
| Group Discussion | 1 |
| Instructional Effectiveness | 1 |
| Intervention | 1 |
| Logical Thinking | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
| International Journal of… | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 1 |
| Reports - Research | 1 |
Education Level
| Elementary Education | 1 |
| Grade 6 | 1 |
| Grade 8 | 1 |
| Grade 9 | 1 |
| High Schools | 1 |
| Intermediate Grades | 1 |
| Junior High Schools | 1 |
| Middle Schools | 1 |
| Secondary Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewed
Direct linkShemwell, Jonathan T.; Gwarjanski, Kalee R.; Capps, Daniel K.; Avargil, Shirly; Meyer, Joanna L. – International Journal of Science Education, 2015
In scientific arguments, claims must have meaning that extends beyond the immediate circumstances of an investigation. That is, claims must be generalised in some way. Therefore, teachers facilitating classroom argumentation must be prepared to support students' efforts to construct or criticise generalised claims. However, widely used…
Descriptors: Generalization, Persuasive Discourse, Science Instruction, Teaching Methods
