Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 0 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 0 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 3 |
Descriptor
Computation | 3 |
Intervention | 3 |
Maximum Likelihood Statistics | 3 |
Research Design | 3 |
Control Groups | 2 |
Regression (Statistics) | 2 |
Research Methodology | 2 |
Statistical Analysis | 2 |
Statistical Significance | 2 |
Case Studies | 1 |
Causal Models | 1 |
More ▼ |
Publication Type
Reports - Evaluative | 2 |
Journal Articles | 1 |
Reports - Research | 1 |
Education Level
Elementary Education | 2 |
Elementary Secondary Education | 1 |
Grade 3 | 1 |
Grade 4 | 1 |
Grade 5 | 1 |
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Schochet, Peter Z. – Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 2013
In school-based randomized control trials (RCTs), a common design is to follow student cohorts over time. For such designs, education researchers usually focus on the place-based (PB) impact parameter, which is estimated using data collected on all students enrolled in the study schools at each data collection point. A potential problem with this…
Descriptors: Student Mobility, Scientific Methodology, Research Design, Intervention
Puma, Michael J.; Olsen, Robert B.; Bell, Stephen H.; Price, Cristofer – National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, 2009
This NCEE Technical Methods report examines how to address the problem of missing data in the analysis of data in Randomized Controlled Trials (RCTs) of educational interventions, with a particular focus on the common educational situation in which groups of students such as entire classrooms or schools are randomized. Missing outcome data are a…
Descriptors: Educational Research, Research Design, Research Methodology, Control Groups
Schochet, Peter Z. – National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, 2009
This paper examines the estimation of two-stage clustered RCT designs in education research using the Neyman causal inference framework that underlies experiments. The key distinction between the considered causal models is whether potential treatment and control group outcomes are considered to be fixed for the study population (the…
Descriptors: Control Groups, Causal Models, Statistical Significance, Computation