Publication Date
| In 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2024 | 0 |
| Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 0 |
| Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 1 |
Descriptor
| Differences | 1 |
| Graduate Students | 1 |
| Interviews | 1 |
| Item Response Theory | 1 |
| Mixed Methods Research | 1 |
| Protocol Analysis | 1 |
| Qualitative Research | 1 |
| Questionnaires | 1 |
| Rating Scales | 1 |
| Scaling | 1 |
| Statistical Analysis | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
| Journal of Mixed Methods… | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 1 |
| Reports - Research | 1 |
Education Level
| Higher Education | 1 |
| Postsecondary Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewed
Direct linkKoskey, Kristin L. K.; Stewart, Victoria C. – Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 2014
This small "n" observational study used a concurrent mixed methods approach to address a void in the literature with regard to the qualitative meaningfulness of the data yielded by absolute magnitude estimation scaling (MES) used to rate subjective stimuli. We investigated whether respondents' scales progressed from less to more and…
Descriptors: Mixed Methods Research, Qualitative Research, Statistical Analysis, Scaling
