Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 0 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 2 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 3 |
Descriptor
Interviews | 3 |
Researchers | 3 |
College Faculty | 2 |
Competition | 2 |
Decision Making | 2 |
Graduate Students | 2 |
Authors | 1 |
Biological Sciences | 1 |
Career Development | 1 |
Conflict Resolution | 1 |
Cooperation | 1 |
More ▼ |
Source
Minerva: A Review of Science,… | 3 |
Author
Bloch, Carter | 1 |
Bozeman, Barry | 1 |
Felt, Ulrike | 1 |
Fochler, Maximilian | 1 |
Graversen, Ebbe Krogh | 1 |
Müller, Ruth | 1 |
Pedersen, Heidi Skovgaard | 1 |
Youtie, Jan | 1 |
Publication Type
Journal Articles | 3 |
Reports - Research | 3 |
Education Level
Higher Education | 3 |
Postsecondary Education | 3 |
Audience
Location
Austria | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Youtie, Jan; Bozeman, Barry – Minerva: A Review of Science, Learning and Policy, 2016
Publishing is central to the academic reward system. Contributorship issues loom large in this context. The need for fairness in authorship decisions is upheld in most collaborations, yet some collaborations are plagued by "nightmare" issues ranging from inappropriate authorship credit to author order issues to exploitation of students…
Descriptors: Authors, Faculty Publishing, Cooperation, Researchers
Bloch, Carter; Graversen, Ebbe Krogh; Pedersen, Heidi Skovgaard – Minerva: A Review of Science, Learning and Policy, 2014
The role of competitive funds as a source of funding for academic research has increased in many countries. For the individual researcher, the receipt of a grant can influence both scientific production and career paths. This paper focuses on the importance of the receipt of a research grant for researchers' academic career paths utilizing a…
Descriptors: Grants, Research, Competition, Career Development
Fochler, Maximilian; Felt, Ulrike; Müller, Ruth – Minerva: A Review of Science, Learning and Policy, 2016
There is a crisis of valuation practices in the current academic life sciences, triggered by unsustainable growth and "hyper-competition." Quantitative metrics in evaluating researchers are seen as replacing deeper considerations of the quality and novelty of work, as well as substantive care for the societal implications of research.…
Descriptors: Biological Sciences, Scientific Research, Foreign Countries, Sustainability