Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 0 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 0 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 2 |
Descriptor
Data Interpretation | 3 |
Evaluation Utilization | 3 |
Interviews | 3 |
Educational Assessment | 2 |
Mathematics Instruction | 2 |
Ambiguity (Context) | 1 |
Benchmarking | 1 |
Bias | 1 |
Data Analysis | 1 |
Data Collection | 1 |
Elementary School Mathematics | 1 |
More ▼ |
Author
Blanchard, Charles | 1 |
Knoetze, Jan | 1 |
Lawrence, Nancy R. | 1 |
McNeil, Keith | 1 |
Nabrs Olah, Leslie | 1 |
Riggan, Matthew | 1 |
Vermoter, Carey-Lee | 1 |
Publication Type
Journal Articles | 2 |
Reports - Research | 2 |
Reports - Evaluative | 1 |
Speeches/Meeting Papers | 1 |
Tests/Questionnaires | 1 |
Education Level
Elementary Education | 1 |
Audience
Teachers | 1 |
Location
Pennsylvania | 1 |
South Africa | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Nabrs Olah, Leslie; Lawrence, Nancy R.; Riggan, Matthew – Peabody Journal of Education, 2010
Although interim assessments are currently promoted as a mechanism for improving teaching and student learning, we know little about how teachers use this data to modify instruction. This article presents findings from a larger study on teachers' use of interim assessment information in elementary mathematics. We address the following questions:…
Descriptors: Educational Assessment, Benchmarking, Evaluation Utilization, Formative Evaluation
Knoetze, Jan; Vermoter, Carey-Lee – South African Journal of Education, 2007
Psychological methods of assessing intelligence have been criticised because of their limited diagnostic-remedial nature and especially their lack of potential for initiating effective and pragmatic intervention programmes. Similarly, the means through which the results of such methods are communicated in order to make them useful and constructive…
Descriptors: Educational Assessment, Remedial Reading, Psychoeducational Methods, Focus Groups
McNeil, Keith; Blanchard, Charles – 1990
Evaluators usually assume that the data they receive are valid, or at least, that the data reflect that which is being evaluated. In a recent evaluation in a large southern school district, evaluators compared their raw interview notes with interview notes edited by the teachers interviewed or project staff. The program evaluated was Project SEED,…
Descriptors: Bias, Data Collection, Data Interpretation, Elementary Secondary Education