Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 0 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 1 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 3 |
Descriptor
Interviews | 3 |
Item Response Theory | 3 |
Protocol Analysis | 3 |
Mixed Methods Research | 2 |
Rating Scales | 2 |
Reliability | 2 |
Surveys | 2 |
Accuracy | 1 |
Affective Measures | 1 |
Beliefs | 1 |
Differences | 1 |
More ▼ |
Author
Besley, John | 1 |
Cloyd, Emily | 1 |
Koskey, Kristin L. K. | 1 |
Leighton, Jacqueline P. | 1 |
Peterman, Karen | 1 |
Robertson Evia, Jane | 1 |
Stewart, Victoria C. | 1 |
Publication Type
Journal Articles | 3 |
Reports - Research | 3 |
Education Level
Grade 12 | 1 |
High Schools | 1 |
Higher Education | 1 |
Postsecondary Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Robertson Evia, Jane; Peterman, Karen; Cloyd, Emily; Besley, John – International Journal of Science Education, Part B: Communication and Public Engagement, 2018
Self-efficacy, or the beliefs people hold about their ability to succeed in certain pursuits, is a long-established construct. Self-efficacy for science communication distinguishes scientists who engage with the public and relates to scientists' attitudes about the public. As such, self-efficacy for public engagement has the potential to serve as…
Descriptors: Self Efficacy, Scientists, Self Concept Measures, Program Validation
Koskey, Kristin L. K.; Stewart, Victoria C. – Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 2014
This small "n" observational study used a concurrent mixed methods approach to address a void in the literature with regard to the qualitative meaningfulness of the data yielded by absolute magnitude estimation scaling (MES) used to rate subjective stimuli. We investigated whether respondents' scales progressed from less to more and…
Descriptors: Mixed Methods Research, Qualitative Research, Statistical Analysis, Scaling
Leighton, Jacqueline P. – Applied Measurement in Education, 2013
The Standards for Educational and Psychological Testing indicate that multiple sources of validity evidence should be used to support the interpretation of test scores. In the past decade, examinee response processes, as a source of validity evidence, have received increased attention. However, there have been relatively few methodological studies…
Descriptors: Psychological Testing, Standards, Interviews, Protocol Analysis