Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 0 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 1 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 2 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 3 |
Descriptor
Academic Ability | 3 |
Computer Science Education | 3 |
Introductory Courses | 3 |
Programming | 3 |
Foreign Countries | 2 |
Gender Differences | 2 |
Predictor Variables | 2 |
Programming Languages | 2 |
Student Characteristics | 2 |
Teaching Methods | 2 |
Academic Aptitude | 1 |
More ▼ |
Author
Arjona-Villicaña, P. David | 1 |
Bergande, Bianca | 1 |
Brune, Philipp | 1 |
Castillo-Barrera, F. Edgar | 1 |
Robins, Anthony | 1 |
Silva-Maceda, Gabriela | 1 |
Wolz, Sabine | 1 |
Publication Type
Journal Articles | 3 |
Reports - Research | 2 |
Reports - Evaluative | 1 |
Tests/Questionnaires | 1 |
Education Level
Higher Education | 3 |
Postsecondary Education | 3 |
Audience
Location
Mexico | 1 |
New Zealand | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Wolz, Sabine; Bergande, Bianca; Brune, Philipp – Cogent Education, 2022
Programming is an essential part of the curriculum of computer science non-major students. The motivation for the various elements of interdisciplinary degrees is often very low in computer science, which faces a gender gap as well. Differences between study courses and gender in confidence, attitude, student numbers, and motivation in computer…
Descriptors: Introductory Courses, Gender Differences, Computer Science Education, Nonmajors
Silva-Maceda, Gabriela; Arjona-Villicaña, P. David; Castillo-Barrera, F. Edgar – IEEE Transactions on Education, 2016
Learning to program is a complex task, and the impact of different pedagogical approaches to teach this skill has been hard to measure. This study examined the performance data of seven cohorts of students (N = 1168) learning programming under three different pedagogical approaches. These pedagogical approaches varied either in the length of the…
Descriptors: Programming, Teaching Methods, Intermode Differences, Cohort Analysis
Robins, Anthony – Computer Science Education, 2010
Compared to other subjects, the typical introductory programming (CS1) course has higher than usual rates of both failing and high grades, creating a characteristic bimodal grade distribution. In this article, I explore two possible explanations. The conventional explanation has been that learners naturally fall into populations of programmers and…
Descriptors: Programming, Learning Processes, Grading, Simulation