Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 0 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 0 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 3 |
Descriptor
Investment | 3 |
Accountability | 2 |
Educational Change | 2 |
Educational Finance | 2 |
Federal Aid | 2 |
Federal Legislation | 2 |
Federal Programs | 2 |
School Districts | 2 |
Administrators | 1 |
Block Grants | 1 |
Competition | 1 |
More ▼ |
Author
Ewen, Danielle | 1 |
Matthews, Hannah | 1 |
Publication Type
Reports - Descriptive | 3 |
Opinion Papers | 1 |
Education Level
Early Childhood Education | 1 |
Elementary Secondary Education | 1 |
Kindergarten | 1 |
Preschool Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
California | 1 |
Georgia | 1 |
Illinois | 1 |
Massachusetts | 1 |
Michigan | 1 |
Texas | 1 |
United States | 1 |
Washington | 1 |
West Virginia | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
No Child Left Behind Act 2001 | 3 |
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Mass Insight Education (NJ1), 2009
State governments wield significant authority in the management of public schools. As a nexus for federal funding, state funding, and regulatory authority, states have both the legal and financial power to help drive school change. The "No Child Left Behind Act" has required each state to create a system of standards-based assessment and…
Descriptors: Educational Indicators, Educational Finance, Accountability, Incentives
The White House, 2006
Keeping our competitive edge in the world economy requires focused policies that lay the groundwork for continued leadership in innovation, exploration, and ingenuity. America's economic strength and global leadership depend in large measure on our Nation's ability to generate and harness the latest in scientific and technological developments and…
Descriptors: Competition, Innovation, Research and Development, Scientific Research
Ewen, Danielle; Matthews, Hannah – Center for Law and Social Policy, Inc. (CLASP), 2007
This paper explores the range of ways in which school districts are using Title I funds for early education through kindergarten and examines how the implementation of No Child Left Behind (NCLB) has impacted those investments. It also makes recommendations for local education agencies (LEAs) interested in creating Title I-funded early education…
Descriptors: Early Childhood Education, Federal Legislation, Second Language Learning, Young Children