Publication Date
| In 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2024 | 0 |
| Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 2 |
| Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 2 |
Descriptor
| Adaptive Testing | 2 |
| Anxiety | 2 |
| Computer Assisted Testing | 2 |
| Item Banks | 2 |
| Item Response Theory | 2 |
| Comparative Analysis | 1 |
| Computer Attitudes | 1 |
| Evaluation Methods | 1 |
| Psychometrics | 1 |
| Student Motivation | 1 |
| Test Reliability | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Author
| Bass, Michael | 1 |
| Howard, Elizabeth | 1 |
| Ishitani, Lucila | 1 |
| Morris, Scott B. | 1 |
| Neapolitan, Richard E. | 1 |
| Yoshioka, Sérgio R. I. | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 2 |
| Reports - Research | 2 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewed
Direct linkMorris, Scott B.; Bass, Michael; Howard, Elizabeth; Neapolitan, Richard E. – International Journal of Testing, 2020
The standard error (SE) stopping rule, which terminates a computer adaptive test (CAT) when the "SE" is less than a threshold, is effective when there are informative questions for all trait levels. However, in domains such as patient-reported outcomes, the items in a bank might all target one end of the trait continuum (e.g., negative…
Descriptors: Computer Assisted Testing, Adaptive Testing, Item Banks, Item Response Theory
Download full textYoshioka, Sérgio R. I.; Ishitani, Lucila – Informatics in Education, 2018
Computerized Adaptive Testing (CAT) is now widely used. However, inserting new items into the question bank of a CAT requires a great effort that makes impractical the wide application of CAT in classroom teaching. One solution would be to use the tacit knowledge of the teachers or experts for a pre-classification and calibrate during the…
Descriptors: Student Motivation, Adaptive Testing, Computer Assisted Testing, Item Response Theory
