Compares a successful job classification procedure used to make use of validity generalization findings in new settings with a much simpler holistic judgement approach for accomplishing the same purpose. Results showed that the latter approach was just as effective, but was much less time consuming and costly. (LLL)

Addresses selecting among and using the numerous quantitative job classification procedures, with a focus on the decision-making tasks and practical difficulties that confront users of each. (Author/ABB)

Conducted a task analysis to determine the extent to which six jobs from a single classification in one organization were similar in their task composition. Results showed five were significantly different, and suggested that selection options would be affected and differing training and evaluation procedures should be used. (JAC)

Evaluated methods for selecting respondents who would respond accurately to items on a job-analysis questionnaire. One method involved obtaining from employees measures that assessed background, performance, and organizational information. A second method involved collecting job-analysis data from all potential job-analysis respondents and…

Outlines issues pertaining to possible sex bias in job evaluation procedures and reviews relevant research. Gives attention to possible sex bias in job analysis procedures, choice and weighting of factors, and reliability and validity issues. Discusses future research needs, particularly reliability and validity aspects of job evaluation…

Showed that reliabilities in the .50 range can be obtained when raters rule out only 15-20% of the items on the Position Analysis Questionnaire as "Does Not Apply" and respond randomly to the remainder. (Author/ABB)

Questions the observed correlation between job experts and naive raters using the Position Analysis Questionnaire (PAQ); and conducts a replication of the Smith and Hakel study (1979) with college students (N=39). Concluded that PAQ ratings from job experts and college students are not equivalent and therefore are not interchangeable. (LLL)

Employees are likely to see factors other than job difficulty, value, and going wage rate as important in reclassification processes. Author examines these factors, and suggests that employee's understanding of and participation in evaluation process can lead to greater job satisfaction. (RW)

Investigated the importance of assigned versus participative goal setting in defining effective supervisory behavior. Government employees (N=57) were assigned to self-set, participatively set, and assigned goal setting conditions. Results showed no significant difference in goal difficulty between those with participatively set goals and self-set…

A multidimensional scaling analysis of 21 work outcomes yielded a latent structure with three dimensions: value attached by society, level of psychological need met, and extent the outcome is inherent in the work itself. Results suggest a multidimensional model of work outcomes is more useful than a categorical approach. (Author)

Job analysts observed and interviewed job incumbents representing 20 diverse occupations and rated each occupation on a wide variety of characteristics to determine the reliability of current job analysis methods and to compare these methods with a new scale. Scales representing broad, abstract job characteristics tended to have higher…

Demonstrated the use of quantitative content validity procedures in the development of a job-related behavioral rating scale criterion for entry-level psychiatric aides. Found that 78 of 83 items were significantly job-relevant using the computation procedures of both Lawshe and Aiken. (JAC)

Investigated whether narrative job descriptions could be converted to quantitative rating scores using job analysis questionnaire techniques. Detailed written descriptions of 121 job categories were rated using the Position Analysis Questionnaire. Indices of interrater agreement suggested acceptable levels of agreement for job dimension scores…

Utilized correlational design and field setting in assessing applicants' reactions to a five-stage recruitment program. Recruitment activities related to applicants' reactions only at initial interview. Job attributes were significant predictors of applicants' reactions. The perceived comparability of job offers, applicants' work experience, and…

Assessed the validity of Hackman and Oldham's Job Characteristics Model by conducting a comprehensive review of nearly 200 relevant studies on the model as well as by applying meta-analytic procedures to much of the data. Available correlational results were reasonably valid and support the multidimensionality of job characteristics and their…