Descriptor
| Computer Assisted Testing | 2 |
| Judges | 2 |
| Adults | 1 |
| Algebra | 1 |
| Classification | 1 |
| Difficulty Level | 1 |
| Educational Diagnosis | 1 |
| Evaluators | 1 |
| Expert Systems | 1 |
| Feedback | 1 |
| Generalizability Theory | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
| Applied Measurement in… | 1 |
Author
| Bennett, Randy Elliot | 2 |
| Rock, Donald A. | 1 |
| Sebrechts, Marc M. | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 1 |
| Reports - Evaluative | 1 |
| Reports - Research | 1 |
| Tests/Questionnaires | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewedBennett, Randy Elliot; Sebrechts, Marc M. – Applied Measurement in Education, 1996
Four human judges agreed highly among themselves about the presence of errors committed by 60 adults solving algebra word problems, but were in less agreement about categorizing faults. An expert system agreed with judges about correctness of answers, but was in even less agreement about categorizing the faults. (SLD)
Descriptors: Adults, Algebra, Classification, Computer Assisted Testing
Download full textBennett, Randy Elliot; Rock, Donald A. – 1993
Formulating-Hypotheses (F-H) items present a situation and ask the examinee to generate as many explanations for it as possible. This study examined the generalizability, validity, and examinee perceptions of a computer-delivered version of the task. Eight F-H questions were administered to 192 graduate students. Half of the items restricted…
Descriptors: Computer Assisted Testing, Difficulty Level, Generalizability Theory, Graduate Students
