Descriptor
Debate | 3 |
Higher Education | 3 |
Judges | 3 |
Evaluation Criteria | 2 |
Oral Interpretation | 2 |
Audience Awareness | 1 |
Communication Research | 1 |
Debate Format | 1 |
Educational Objectives | 1 |
Educational Research | 1 |
Evaluation Methods | 1 |
More ▼ |
Source
Author
Cronn-Mills, Daniel | 3 |
Cook, Jeff | 1 |
Croucher, Stephen M. | 1 |
Publication Type
Speeches/Meeting Papers | 3 |
Reports - Research | 2 |
Opinion Papers | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Cronn-Mills, Daniel – 1995
Understanding communication (of which individual events is a part) requires a triangle among theory-practice-criticism, and any missing component dramatically hinders understanding and ability. Students compete in, and judges judge, forensics to better enhance communication understanding and abilities. The process of oral interpretation requires a…
Descriptors: Audience Awareness, Debate, Evaluation Criteria, Higher Education
Cronn-Mills, Daniel; Croucher, Stephen M. – 2001
The goal of forensics is to teach students the complexity and impact of communication on the human condition. The ballot is the key to the educational process within the competitive realm of forensics. The judge is both an adjudicator and a teacher within each round, and, therefore, ballots should provide students with comments indicating reasons…
Descriptors: Debate, Educational Objectives, Educational Research, Evaluation Criteria
Cronn-Mills, Daniel; Cook, Jeff – 1995
A study examined the beliefs and attitudes of students, coaches, and judges on the use of manuscripts at the college level in oral interpretation events (prose, drama, program oral interpretation, dramatic duo, and poetry). Survey data were collected from students, coach-judges, and hired judges participating in a Midwestern forensics tournament…
Descriptors: Communication Research, Debate, Debate Format, Higher Education