Descriptor
Judges | 4 |
Court Litigation | 3 |
Educational Policy | 2 |
Elementary Secondary Education | 2 |
Federal Courts | 2 |
Citizenship Education | 1 |
Civics | 1 |
Civil Liberties | 1 |
Civil Rights | 1 |
College Students | 1 |
Conflict Resolution | 1 |
More ▼ |
Publication Type
Legal/Legislative/Regulatory… | 4 |
Journal Articles | 3 |
Opinion Papers | 1 |
Speeches/Meeting Papers | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
Practitioners | 1 |
Location
Connecticut | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
United States Constitution | 1 |
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating

Hyman, Ronald T. – West's Education Law Reporter, 1990
Sets forth and considers educational beliefs explicitly stated by the justices of the Supreme Court in major court opinions rendered in the 1980s. The justices' educational viewpoints, in general, have turned to an emphasis on control, discipline, order, authority, and the inculcation of traditional values. (60 references) (MLF)
Descriptors: Court Litigation, Discipline, Educational Principles, Elementary Secondary Education
Murphy, Paul L. – 1986
A major constitutional issue in the twentieth century is the extent to which the U.S. Constitution should be interpreted to fit changing times and circumstances. In the latter part of the nineteenth century, the Supreme Court dispensed a "mechanical jurisprudence" based on an "objective" interpretation of the Constitution and…
Descriptors: Citizenship Education, Civics, Civil Rights, Conservatism

Delaney, Stephen B. – Equity & Excellence in Education, 1996
In the case of Sheff v. O'Neill the Connecticut Supreme Court ruled that the Hartford school system and its suburbs were unconstitutionally segregated. This article provides background, the significant findings, the court's rationale, and dissenting opinions, along with a discussion of the state's probable responses. (SLD)
Descriptors: Court Litigation, Desegregation Methods, Desegregation Plans, Educational History
Stevens, John Paul – Chronicle of Higher Education, 1985
The Supreme Court's opinion and concurring opinion in a case limiting the right of courts to overturn academic decisions, based on the case of university's dismissal of a student after his failure of an important examination, are presented. (MSE)
Descriptors: Civil Liberties, College Students, Conflict Resolution, Court Litigation