Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 0 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 2 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 3 |
Descriptor
Foreign Countries | 3 |
Judges | 3 |
Comparative Analysis | 2 |
Reliability | 2 |
Scoring | 2 |
Validity | 2 |
Value Judgment | 2 |
Writing Evaluation | 2 |
Academic Discourse | 1 |
College Students | 1 |
Elementary School Students | 1 |
More ▼ |
Source
Assessment in Education:… | 3 |
Author
Bramley, Tom | 1 |
Coertjens, Liesje | 1 |
De Maeyer, Sven | 1 |
Donche, Vincent | 1 |
Lesterhuis, Marije | 1 |
Pollitt, Alastair | 1 |
Vitello, Sylvia | 1 |
van Daal, Tine | 1 |
Publication Type
Journal Articles | 3 |
Reports - Research | 3 |
Education Level
Elementary Education | 1 |
Higher Education | 1 |
Postsecondary Education | 1 |
Audience
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Bramley, Tom; Vitello, Sylvia – Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 2019
Comparative Judgement (CJ) is an increasingly widely investigated method in assessment for creating a scale, for example of the quality of essays. One area that has attracted attention in CJ studies is the optimisation of the selection of pairs of objects for judgement. One approach is known as adaptive comparative judgement (ACJ). It has been…
Descriptors: Reliability, Evaluation Methods, Comparative Analysis, Essay Tests
van Daal, Tine; Lesterhuis, Marije; Coertjens, Liesje; Donche, Vincent; De Maeyer, Sven – Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 2019
Recently, comparative judgement has been introduced as an alternative method for scoring essays. Although this method is promising in terms of obtaining reliable scores, empirical evidence concerning its validity is lacking. The current study examines implications resulting from two critical assumptions underpinning the use of comparative…
Descriptors: Academic Discourse, Validity, Writing Evaluation, Value Judgment
Pollitt, Alastair – Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 2012
Adaptive Comparative Judgement (ACJ) is a modification of Thurstone's method of comparative judgement that exploits the power of adaptivity, but in scoring rather than testing. Professional judgement by teachers replaces the marking of tests; a judge is asked to compare the work of two students and simply to decide which of them is the better.…
Descriptors: Value Judgment, Comparative Analysis, Scoring, Teachers