A single-site, multiple-use model for analyzing trip demand is derived from a multiple site regional model based on utility maximizing choice theory. The model is used to analyze and compare trips to the Boundary Waters Canoe Area Wilderness for several types of use. Travel cost elasticities of demand are compared and discussed. (Authors/JN)

Since the Hotelling-Clawson approach to estimating the demand for recreation resources assumes only one destination with no substitutes, alternative estimation techniques are presented and tested. Implications of the use of these techniques are discussed. (JN)