Publication Date
| In 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2024 | 0 |
| Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 1 |
| Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 1 |
| Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 2 |
Descriptor
| Language Acquisition | 2 |
| Scores | 2 |
| Second Language Learning | 2 |
| Adolescents | 1 |
| Computational Linguistics | 1 |
| English | 1 |
| English (Second Language) | 1 |
| Essays | 1 |
| Finno Ugric Languages | 1 |
| Foreign Countries | 1 |
| Indexes | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
| Language Testing | 2 |
Author
| Botarleanu, Robert-Mihai | 1 |
| Crossley, Scott | 1 |
| Dascalu, Mihai | 1 |
| Jarvis, Scott | 1 |
| McCarthy, Philip M. | 1 |
| Monteiro, Kátia | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 2 |
| Reports - Evaluative | 1 |
| Reports - Research | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
| Finland | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewed
Direct linkMonteiro, Kátia; Crossley, Scott; Botarleanu, Robert-Mihai; Dascalu, Mihai – Language Testing, 2023
Lexical frequency benchmarks have been extensively used to investigate second language (L2) lexical sophistication, especially in language assessment studies. However, indices based on semantic co-occurrence, which may be a better representation of the experience language users have with lexical items, have not been sufficiently tested as…
Descriptors: Second Language Learning, Second Languages, Native Language, Semantics
McCarthy, Philip M.; Jarvis, Scott – Language Testing, 2007
A reliable index of lexical diversity (LD) has remained stubbornly elusive for over 60 years. Meanwhile, researchers in fields as varied as "stylistics," "neuropathology," "language acquisition," and even "forensics" continue to use flawed LD indices--often ignorant that their results are questionable and in…
Descriptors: Second Language Learning, English (Second Language), Foreign Countries, Adolescents
