Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 0 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 1 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 1 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 1 |
Descriptor
Language Patterns | 3 |
Linguistic Theory | 3 |
Cognitive Processes | 2 |
Speech Communication | 2 |
Brain | 1 |
English | 1 |
Error Analysis (Language) | 1 |
Figurative Language | 1 |
Form Classes (Languages) | 1 |
Intention | 1 |
Interviews | 1 |
More ▼ |
Source
Journal of Psycholinguistic… | 3 |
Author
Brown, J. C. | 1 |
Filik, Ruth | 1 |
Ingram, Joanne | 1 |
Kowal, Sabine | 1 |
Leuthold, Hartmut | 1 |
Moxey, Linda | 1 |
O'Connell, Daniel C. | 1 |
Publication Type
Journal Articles | 3 |
Reports - Research | 2 |
Reports - Descriptive | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Filik, Ruth; Ingram, Joanne; Moxey, Linda; Leuthold, Hartmut – Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 2021
According to the Presupposition-Denial Account, complement set reference arises when focus is on the "shortfall" between the amount conveyed by a natural language quantifier and a larger, expected amount. Negative quantifiers imply a shortfall, through the denial of a presupposition, whereas positive quantifiers do not. An exception may…
Descriptors: Figurative Language, Linguistic Theory, Natural Language Processing, Form Classes (Languages)
Brown, J. C. – Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 2004
The dominant viewpoint regarding phonologically driven speech errors is that segments are the units responsible behind the errors. The goal of this paper is to illustrate the point that other potential candidates for explaining these speech errors, which have gone largely unnoticed, provide a better explanatory framework for speech errors than do…
Descriptors: Phonology, Error Analysis (Language), Phonemes, Intonation
O'Connell, Daniel C.; Kowal, Sabine – Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 2005
Clark and Fox Tree (2002) have presented empirical evidence, based primarily on the London-Lund corpus (LL; Svartvik & Quirk, 1980), that the fillers "uh" and "um" are conventional English words that signal a speaker's intention to initiate a minor and a major delay, respectively. We present here empirical analyses of "uh" and "um" and of silent…
Descriptors: Language Patterns, Linguistic Theory, Intention, Speech Communication