Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 0 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 0 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 5 |
Descriptor
Language Processing | 6 |
Reading Processes | 6 |
Eye Movements | 4 |
Models | 4 |
Word Recognition | 3 |
Cues | 2 |
English | 2 |
Evidence | 2 |
Sentences | 2 |
Time | 2 |
Word Frequency | 2 |
More ▼ |
Source
Journal of Experimental… | 6 |
Author
Rayner, Keith | 2 |
Acha, Joana | 1 |
Angele, Bernhard | 1 |
Baayen, R. Harald | 1 |
Berent, Iris | 1 |
Bertram, Raymond | 1 |
Davis, Colin J. | 1 |
Drieghe, Denis | 1 |
Eiter, Brianna M. | 1 |
Hollway, Elizabeth C. | 1 |
Inhoff, Albrecht W. | 1 |
More ▼ |
Publication Type
Journal Articles | 6 |
Reports - Research | 4 |
Reports - Evaluative | 2 |
Education Level
Higher Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
California | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Lupker, Stephen J.; Acha, Joana; Davis, Colin J.; Perea, Manuel – Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 2012
In most current models of word recognition, the word recognition process is assumed to be driven by the activation of letter units (i.e., that letters are the perceptual units in reading). An alternative possibility is that the word recognition process is driven by the activation of grapheme units, that is, that graphemes, rather than letters, are…
Descriptors: Language Processing, Evidence, Priming, Word Recognition
Angele, Bernhard; Rayner, Keith – Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 2011
We used the boundary paradigm (Rayner, 1975) to test two hypotheses that might explain why no conclusive evidence has been found for the existence of n + 2 preprocessing effects. In Experiment 1, we tested whether parafoveal processing of the second word to the right of fixation (n + 2) takes place only when the preceding word (n + 1) is very…
Descriptors: Models, Hypothesis Testing, Evidence, Vision
Staub, Adrian; White, Sarah J.; Drieghe, Denis; Hollway, Elizabeth C.; Rayner, Keith – Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 2010
Recent research using word recognition paradigms, such as lexical decision and speeded pronunciation, has investigated how a range of variables affect the location and shape of response time distributions, using both parametric and non-parametric techniques. In this article, we explore the distributional effects of a word frequency manipulation on…
Descriptors: Reaction Time, Eye Movements, Word Recognition, Human Body
Kuperman, Victor; Schreuder, Robert; Bertram, Raymond; Baayen, R. Harald – Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 2009
This article reports an eye-tracking experiment with 2,500 polymorphemic Dutch compounds presented in isolation for visual lexical decision while readers' eye movements were registered. The authors found evidence that both full forms of compounds ("dishwasher") and their constituent morphemes (e.g., "dish," "washer," "er") and morphological…
Descriptors: Cues, Eye Movements, Language Processing, Morphemes
Berent, Iris – Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 2008
Are the phonological representations of printed and spoken words isomorphic? This question is addressed by investigating the restrictions on onsets. Cross-linguistic research suggests that onsets of rising sonority are preferred to sonority plateaus, which, in turn, are preferred to sonority falls (e.g., bnif, bdif, lbif). Of interest is whether…
Descriptors: Language Research, Speech, Phonology, Grammar
Inhoff, Albrecht W.; Eiter, Brianna M.; Radach, Ralph – Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 2005
Sequential attention shift models of reading predict that an attended (typically fixated) word must be recognized before useful linguistic information can be obtained from the following (parafoveal) word. These models also predict that linguistic information is obtained from a parafoveal word immediately prior to a saccade toward it. To test these…
Descriptors: Sentences, Eye Movements, Language Processing, Reading Processes