Publication Date
| In 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2024 | 0 |
| Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 1 |
| Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 2 |
| Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 2 |
Descriptor
| Accuracy | 2 |
| Comparative Analysis | 2 |
| Language Processing | 2 |
| Morphology (Languages) | 2 |
| Second Language Learning | 2 |
| Syntax | 2 |
| Teaching Methods | 2 |
| Writing Evaluation | 2 |
| Writing Instruction | 2 |
| College Students | 1 |
| Educational Benefits | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 2 |
| Reports - Research | 2 |
Education Level
| Higher Education | 2 |
| Postsecondary Education | 2 |
Audience
Location
| South Korea | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
| International English… | 1 |
| Test of English as a Foreign… | 1 |
| Test of English for… | 1 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewed
Download full textLeow, Ronald P.; Thinglum, Anne; Leow, Stephanie A. – Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 2022
Whether type of written corrective feedback (WCF) impacts L2 learning has been investigated for decades. While many product-oriented studies report conflicting findings, the paucity of studies adopting both a process-oriented and curricular approach (e.g., Caras, 2019) underscores the call for further research on: (1) the processing dimension of…
Descriptors: Error Correction, Second Language Learning, Second Language Instruction, Spanish
Schenck, Andrew; Baldwin, Matthew – Online Submission, 2019
When viewed through a generic, one-size-fits-all perspective, use of input enhancement does not appear effective. Through analysis of individual grammatical features and different learner proficiency levels, a significant impact may be revealed. To study the impact of input enhancement on diverse grammatical features, 16 short reading texts and…
Descriptors: Grammar, Linguistic Input, Language Proficiency, Teaching Methods
