Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 1 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 2 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 4 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 6 |
Descriptor
Computer Assisted Testing | 6 |
Language Tests | 6 |
Measurement | 6 |
Test Items | 4 |
Accuracy | 2 |
Adaptive Testing | 2 |
Computation | 2 |
English (Second Language) | 2 |
English Language Learners | 2 |
Foreign Countries | 2 |
Item Response Theory | 2 |
More ▼ |
Source
Educational Assessment | 2 |
Advanced Education | 1 |
Applied Measurement in… | 1 |
Applied Psychological… | 1 |
Educational Measurement:… | 1 |
Author
Castellano, Katherine | 1 |
Chen, Li-Ju | 1 |
Cohen, Dale | 1 |
Cohen, Jon | 1 |
Gawliczek, Piotr | 1 |
Guzman-Orth, Danielle | 1 |
Himelfarb, Igor | 1 |
Ho, Rong-Guey | 1 |
Huynh, Huynh | 1 |
J. R. Lockwood | 1 |
Kim, Do-Hong | 1 |
More ▼ |
Publication Type
Journal Articles | 6 |
Reports - Evaluative | 3 |
Reports - Research | 3 |
Education Level
Secondary Education | 2 |
Grade 3 | 1 |
Grade 8 | 1 |
Grade 9 | 1 |
High Schools | 1 |
Audience
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
William Belzak; J. R. Lockwood; Yigal Attali – Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 2024
Remote proctoring, or monitoring test takers through internet-based, video-recording software, has become critical for maintaining test security on high-stakes assessments. The main role of remote proctors is to make judgments about test takers' behaviors and decide whether these behaviors constitute rule violations. Variability in proctor…
Descriptors: Computer Security, High Stakes Tests, English (Second Language), Second Language Learning
Gawliczek, Piotr; Krykun, Viktoriia; Tarasenko, Nataliya; Tyshchenko, Maksym; Shapran, Oleksandr – Advanced Education, 2021
The article deals with the innovative, cutting age solution within the language testing realm, namely computer adaptive language testing (CALT) in accordance with the NATO Standardization Agreement 6001 (NATO STANAG 6001) requirements for further implementation in foreign language training of personnel of the Armed Forces of Ukraine (AF of…
Descriptors: Computer Assisted Testing, Adaptive Testing, Language Tests, Second Language Instruction
Cohen, Dale; Tracy, Ryan; Cohen, Jon – Applied Measurement in Education, 2017
This study examined the effectiveness and influence on validity of a computer-based pop-up English glossary accommodation for English learners (ELs) in grades 3 and 7. In a randomized controlled trial, we administered pop-up English glossaries with audio to students taking a statewide accountability English language arts (ELA) and mathematics…
Descriptors: English (Second Language), Glossaries, Testing Accommodations, Measurement
Wolf, Mikyung Kim; Guzman-Orth, Danielle; Lopez, Alexis; Castellano, Katherine; Himelfarb, Igor; Tsutagawa, Fred S. – Educational Assessment, 2016
This article investigates ways to improve the assessment of English learner students' English language proficiency given the current movement of creating next-generation English language proficiency assessments in the Common Core era. In particular, this article discusses the integration of scaffolding strategies, which are prevalently utilized as…
Descriptors: English Language Learners, Scaffolding (Teaching Technique), Language Tests, Language Proficiency
Yen, Yung-Chin; Ho, Rong-Guey; Laio, Wen-Wei; Chen, Li-Ju; Kuo, Ching-Chin – Applied Psychological Measurement, 2012
In a selected response test, aberrant responses such as careless errors and lucky guesses might cause error in ability estimation because these responses do not actually reflect the knowledge that examinees possess. In a computerized adaptive test (CAT), these aberrant responses could further cause serious estimation error due to dynamic item…
Descriptors: Computer Assisted Testing, Adaptive Testing, Test Items, Response Style (Tests)
Kim, Do-Hong; Huynh, Huynh – Educational Assessment, 2010
This study investigated whether scores obtained from the online and paper-and-pencil administrations of the statewide end-of-course English test were equivalent for students with and without disabilities. Score comparability was evaluated by examining equivalence of factor structure (measurement invariance) and differential item and bundle…
Descriptors: Computer Assisted Testing, Language Tests, English, Scores